I found the article authored by Ziba Mir-Hosseini exciting and informative. Although I bought most of his ideas, some of the factors were disagreeable. In the beginning, the question is clear and precise. The author states about the women in Morocco and Iran who suffered from the new political reform. The comparison between the Islamic republic and monarchy is well aligned. The method of research was precise and promised reliable information free from illegalities. Moreover, the essay is well structured hence giving the information systematically.
Different rationales are used to retain men’s privileges in marriage. However, the author argues that the majority of Iranian women suffered after they adopted the new reform. At first, I would like to answer how the dynamics and politics of recent family law reforms in Morocco and Iran compare. Previously, the family law was sourced from fiqh or Islamic jurisprudence; Maliki Sunni School in Morocco and the Twelver Shi’a School in Iran.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
I learned that women from Morocco did not endure ruthless suffering compared to Iranian women. Therefore, the question remains how, and what techniques did the Morocco women use to succeed in vetting about radical reforms of Maliki law? On the other hand, why did the Iranian women fail to bring related improvements in the Shi’a law? The author uses perfect skills in research on the practice and theory of Islamic law in Morocco and Iran. In this case, he neither focused on legislation nor Islamic jurisprudential texts. Therefore, the result in their comparison was straight and unbiased.
At last the two communities diverged based on gender and family. In Iran, men were permitted to divorce and remarry or take a second wife without restriction from the current wife. The divergence at first came by political relaxation in Iran. The unplanned relaxation brought a division on the ruling elite into two different factions. The bitterly opposed factions had different readings of gender rights and Islam concerning new law that gave men privileges in marriage. On the contrary, Morocco relaxation was initiated hence strengthening the political elite. The political elite eventually supported the women’s groups thus using the similar politico-religious body to oversee the gender and family law.
Divergence can also be related to international developments. The two counties relation with superstar countries can either weaken or strengthen the body. Cooperation with unions such as the United States union and Europe union contribute to fair and genuine development and implementations of law. In this case, Iran women were unable to secure a correct code due to the intervention by the United States government regarding atomic weapons. On the other hand, the Morocco government was stable and was monitored by the union members hence giving women legitimate rights. The external and internal factors have a significant role in the passing of bills and laws. Citizens in a stable country have a greater possibility of enjoying their rights than those in a poorly managed state.
It was interesting analyzing the article. At the end of the reading session, it allowed me to reflect on the politics and dynamics of family law in Iran and Morocco. Most importantly, I gained a clear understanding and insight on the untold women’s suffering due to the new reform in Iran. To a certain extent, the article helped me understand these women better and think of the possible ways that could make their situations better. Ziba Mir-Hosseini presented a unique focus that gave vast, valuable ideas that will positively affect my concentration on the future papers I will read.
