Mass casualty constitutes of an incident involving numbers of casualties exceeding the available local resources in healthcare to cater for the victims tangled in the occurrence. Mass casualty is characterized by multiple fatalities and a surge of injured patients demanding emergency services in healthcare institutions (Osborn & Easthope, 2019). The occurrences of mass casualty culminate mostly from mass shootings and bombing as well as other atrocities against human life. Victims of mass casualty suffer great deals of challenges including injuries, post traumatic stress, negligence by caregivers, stress, economic constricts as well as weak legal representation.
Advocates mandated with tasks of representing victims of mass casualty ought to have a clear legal framework and adequate information to ensure they present solid cases and emerge victorious when fighting for their clients. Through understanding challenges associated with mass casualty and in the law field, advocates find it easy when handling clients’ cases related to these incidences. Therefore, advocates have to comprehend changes in the law field as well as maintaining competition when addressing cases by victims of a mass casualty which guarantees victory to their circumstances.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The major challenge affecting advocates handling mass casualty cases involve unrealistic expectations from clients. Advocates deal with demanding clients who disrupt the life balance and contribute to stress. This is due to misconceptions held by clients on the works of advocates blurring the line of their tasks, contributing to unrealistic expectations (Krouse, & Richardson, 2015). Countering the challenge require advocates to engage in open communication and transparency with clients of mass casualty. Managing client’s expectations aids in establishing healthy boundaries with them, safeguarding productivity, and ensure success in the case. Communicating with clients helps understand advocate capabilities and roles in the case as well as setting boundaries for what can be done.
Advocates handling mass casualty cases face the challenge of long working hours due to unpredicted schedules by courts. Also, unanticipated developments in the client’s mass casualty cases and postponing disrupts advocate’s time, which is attributed to affect their health and wellbeing negatively ( Strous, & Gold, 2019). The problem of long working hours can be counteracted by advocates improving time management. Advocate are advised to eliminate destructions, delegating light tasks to subordinates as well as devoting time to specific responsibilities in the cases. Similarly, advocates ought to eliminate time-wasting activities, thus providing more control over an unpredictable schedule.
Another challenge facing mass casualty advocates involves excessive stress and anxiety due to long working hours and rescheduling, which wears body and mind while also isolating them from family and friends. This makes it inflexible to prioritize self-care to advocates ignoring their needs leading to life imbalance, which takes a toll on their wellness. However, excessive stress and anxiety can be counteracted by practicing self-care by the advocates ( Strous, & Gold, 2019). Advocates ought to understand that self-care is a necessity. It makes it easier to dedicate their time to keeping body and spirit healthy with good eating habits, workout routines, and meditation, thus managing stress and anxiety when dealing with mass casualty cases.
As seen from above discussion, mass casualty cases calls for appropriate legal representation in courts. Victims of mass casualty should be protected and compensated for the predicaments they suffer. Therefore, advocates should be aware of problems in their fields as well as understanding their client’s needs. Adequate information and background surrounding clients and advocates should be attributed to providing a solid case that will guarantee victory in mass casualty cases.
References
Osborn, D., & Easthope, L. (2019). Identification of the incapacitated patient in mass casualty events: an exploration of challenges, solutions, and barriers. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness , 13 (2), 338-344.
Krouse, W. J., & Richardson, D. J. (2015). Mass murder with firearms: Incidents and victims, 1999-2013.
Strous, R. D., & Gold, A. (2019). Ethical lessons learned and to be learned from mass casualty events by terrorism. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology , 32 (2), 174-178.
