The analysis of the essay HIE in Alaska indicates different strengths and weaknesses portrayed by the author's way of reasoning. The most notable strength portrayed in the essay involves the use of logical reasoning. Logical reasoning is an important factor that portrays an understanding of the concepts and ideologies presented (Nelson & Staggers, 2014). The author of the essay presented logical reasoning throughout the essay, which is an aspect that is indicated by the kind of facts and figures presented. The author focused on logically analyzing the topic, thus the ability to obtain factual information that is comprehensive and detailed. Through logical reasoning, the essay provided relevant information concerning the topic of discussion on health information in Alaska (Braunstein, 2014). Additionally, it is important to note that the author capitalizes on the use of arguments that were logical, which is an important aspect that portrays a major strength in the ability to reason effectively.
On the other hand, there is a notable weakness in the reasoning of the author, which can be noted through the presentation of ideas in the essay. The weakness noted in this case is the overgeneralization of facts. In logic and reasoning, overgeneralization involves making conclusions based on too little data (Habernal et al., 2018). An evaluation of the essay indicates that there were some instances where the author engaged in overgeneralization. In this case, the author focused on too little data other than focusing on a wide range of information to help in the process of drawing relevant conclusions. Overgeneralization may result in the unreliability of the information presented. Although the author engaged in the logical presentation of facts in the essay, the issue of overgeneralization acted as a major hindrance to the effective presentation of information regarding the topic of discussion. It is important to focus on engaging in an in-depth analysis of a wide range of information regarding a topic of discussion to ensure that the presented information and arguments make logical sense.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Braunstein, M. L. (2014). Contemporary health informatics . AHIMA Press.
Habernal, I., Wachsmuth, H., Gurevych, I., & Stein, B. (2018, June). SemEval-2018 task 12: The argument reasoning comprehension task. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (pp. 763-772).
Nelson, R., & Staggers, N. (2014). Health Informatics: An Interprofessional Approach. St. Louis.
