In recent years, illegal cell phone usage in correction facilities has become prevalent. The contraband cell phones, usually smuggled in by corrupted guards or family members during visiting hours, have been used to carry out sinister acts. A case in point was in a prison where incarcerated gang members orchestrated a riot using phones, creating havoc inside as well as outside the facility. In other cases, potential witnesses are assassinated before they appear in court. Preventing the entry of these contrabands may prove to be challenging, especially those brought in by families. In most correctional centers, a single officer oversees a large number of visitors.
The installation of cell phone jammers has been acknowledged as a possible solution for the problem. Reformatory institutions have requested the jammers to ensure that inmates no longer access illegal phone services. The devices will disrupt criminal networks, therefore, preventing the prisoners from circumventing monitored channels of communication to plot unlawful activities (Burke & Owen, 2010) . Correctional professionals believe that the process is a step forward in countering the threat created by the contraband phones.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
However, the constitution does not authorize state prison officials to jam cell phone signals. The Federal Communication Commission is the only body responsible for the authorization and installation of the devices. According to them, jamming mobile signals has numerous potential setbacks. The safety of the public is put to jeopardy, especially during emergencies. The jammers may result in a spillover of interference beyond the prison boundaries. As a result, members of the public attempting to access 9-1-1 services may not be successful. Legitimate calls between family members or employees in a private firm may also not go through.
In adverse cases, terrorists may take advantage of the absence of cell signals to execute criminal actives. Furthermore, the entire process is costly because the jammers are undoubtedly expensive. It demands high profile engineering to design and install the devices in a manner that accommodates the features of the buildings.
References
Burke, T. W., & Owen, S. S. (2010). Cell phones as prison contraband. FBI L. Enforcement Bull. , 79 , 10.
