Arguments for abolishing plea deals raise concerns about accountability, justice and equal punishment. Plea deals are unjust since convicted people lose some protections, including the right to a jury trial. They encourage criminals to derail justice, thus decreasing support for the process of crime by the public ( Parry et al., 2013) . The trend of imposing lighter penalties on offenders leads to unequal sentences where the penalty is too lax for the crime's seriousness. Plea deals offer innocent people the ability to plead guilty to non-committed crimes. However, the complete abolition of plea deals can have numerous impacts on the justice systems.
Primarily, plea arbitration helps workers in criminal justice to individualize and render sentences less serious. It is an institutional necessity—without it, courts are flooded, and the course of justice is stuck. The plea deals spare the prosecutor, the courts and the defendant the costs of continuing.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Within the court justice system, it is difficult to manage the convicts adequately. The government cannot afford the cost of conducting trials, and certainly, it cannot afford all these people the cost of running prisons. If plea negotiations can be outlawed, then at all levels, the government would not be able to afford to attempt and imprison all those that are arrested ( Parry et al., 2013) . The government would probably have to hire 1% of citizens and personnel as the guards of the immense prison empire instead of having 1% of the adult population in prison. Plea bargains appear unlawful in some instances ( Parry et al., 2013) . However, they are more advantageous to the justice systems and the federal and state governments as well.
The other major issue is that more crime will go unpunished with the elimination of plea deals. Everyone who takes a plea deal appears unlikely to be guilty, but each of them may be much less likely to be innocent than others. Many will commit more crimes against the public ( Parry et al., 2013) . They would finally be charged and sentenced, but the innocent may be devastated in the meantime. There seems to be even more violence as a result.
One would think that if the justice system can only prosecute a small fraction of today's crimes, the prosecution of consensual crimes would stop and concentrate on crimes that pose a real public risk. Plea negotiations could take some reform, but plea negotiations' total abolition is an extremely long time in prison for many people while allowing crimes to be rampant.
References
Parry, John T. & Richardson, L. Song. (Eds.) (2013). The Constitution and the Future of Criminal Justice in America. New York, NY. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Constitution_and_the_Future_of_Crimi.html?id=pVNsAAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
