15 Aug 2022

157

Intel Briefing on Boston Bombing

Format: APA

Academic level: University

Paper type: Speech

Words: 1024

Pages: 4

Downloads: 0

The Boston Bombing took place on 15th April 2015 when two pressure-cooker bombs were kept close to the finish line during the marathon. The bombs went off at intervals of exactly eleven seconds. There were three individuals who died instantly, and more than 260 people were seriously injured. The bombing took place at two-forty nine pm. A large number of runners, more than five thousand six hundred were still running as the race was yet to be over. The major suspects in the Boston bombing were DZhoskar and Tamerlan. The two individuals had migrated to America from Kyrgyzstan with their parents Anzor and Zubeidat Tsarnaev. The two suspects were brothers and DZhokhar moved to the United States in the year 2002, and later he received an immigration benefit and summoned the rest of his family members. Later in the year 2004, all the family members became registered citizens and permanent residents in America (Press, 2015). 

Tarmelan and Zubeidat had received the attention of the Federal Bureau of Investigation two years before the Boston Marathon. It happened after the Russian FSB gave the FBI concerning the two brothers and indicated that they were associated with Islamic radicalization. According to the information disbursed, Tarmelan and Zubeidat advocated for radical Islam, and Tarmelan was said that he had planned of migrating to Russia where he would join an unrecognized covert group in Dagestan and Chechnya, two identified Muslim provinces. The information also stated that Tarmelan was planning to use the name Tsarni. The personal data concerning the two brothers that were given by the Russian intelligence service was the telephone contacts and email addresses (McPhee, 2017). The Russian intelligence, on the other hand, was to receive information on the travel plans of the older brother to Russia. The FBI branch in Moscow sent a letter to the FSB on March 9th, 2011 requesting them on regular updates on the developing case of the two suspects. A copy of the letter was also received by the FBI Boston Field Division and FBI Counterterrorism Division. The two groups were assigned the role of investigating the case and share the discoveries with Moscow. However, the FBI did not provide any information to FSB even after the investigations (Press, 2015). 

It’s time to jumpstart your paper!

Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.

Get custom essay

The Boston branch received information from the letter, and they were to investigate the two brothers though more attention was given to Tamerlan who appeared more aggressive. The duty of the Boston branch was to establish whether the two brothers posed any threat to America. Agent CT from the FBI department was assigned the case, and his duty was to evaluate the entire family of the suspects. The discovered information was kept among the confidential files of FBI. The investigation involved visiting the residential areas where the entire family lived, former school and interviews with Tamerlan himself as well as with his parents. The investigation provided different data from the one provided by the FSB on the dates of birth and the second name of the older brother. It was said that Agent CT did not follow the established criteria when he was evaluating the case. The agent went to the mosque which the family went for services, which was unlawful and during the investigation; he did not get an authorization from the local police agency. The ex-wife of Tamerlan was also involved in the investigation since in the year 2009; he had accused him of being abusive. Other close allies of the suspect were assessed as well, which is wrong, according to the international set standards, which determines the methods of getting information from a suspect (Press, 2015). The agent, however, left out some information, for instance, on the travel plans to Russia or changes which had happened suddenly on the way of life of Tamerlan. The information concerning the rebel provinces of Chechnya and Dagestan was left out. The agent was considered to have collected a considerable large data in comparison to the FBI databases which provided limited information on the case. 

The different agencies that were part of the case indicated that before the Boston attacks, there was no other information on the two suspects that had been provided to the law enforcement agencies in the local and state levels. The information which was largely accessible was the one provided by the CT agent. The Joint Terrorism Task Force from Boston, which is under the FBI evaluated Tarmelan to establish whether he could be considered as a potential threat to America. The investigations were closed after three months indicating that the suspect was not a threat and not linked to terrorism. The assessment was closed after the discoveries of the AC Agent were done and each agency that had access to the information stated that the suspect did not appear a radicalized Muslim. Without further investigations, the case was closed. The closing of the investigation indicated that Tamerlan was clean and he was even inaccurately indicated as a former prosecutor from Kyrgyzstan. The FSB was asked to close the investigation which would be considered as a chance for the two brothers to conduct their malicious intention of bombing Boston since no one was investigating them (McPhee, 2017). 

In September 2011, the FSB gave information to the CIA concerning one of the bombing suspects, Tamerlan, which was similar to the one that had been provided to the FBI. The CIA later provided the same data to the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) which helped tracking the suspects better and ensured that they posed no threat to the nation. The information of the two suspects was also provided to the Department of Homeland Security. All the different agencies began watching Tamerlan, to determine if he was a threat to the community. The discoveries done after seven months by the FSB were same. The Moscow branch of FBI opened up a file for the case to ensure continuous recording of the performance of the suspect (McPhee, 2017). 

Tamerlan mover to Russia in January 2012 just as the Russian intelligence department had indicated. He moved to the two Muslim provinces where the most of his time and no more investigations were done on him. When he moved to Russia, the CT Agent was notified by the Russian department that the suspect had landed in the airport. In July, the same year Tamerlan moved back to America after his travel wait was approved. There were speculations that the Russian agent notified the CT Agent so that he could delay the flight, though it took place at last. However, the closing of the investigation gave a chance to Tamerlan and his brother to stage the bombing at Boston marathon. 

References 

McPhee, M. (2017). Maximum harm: The Tsarnaev brothers, the FBI, and the road to the Marathon Bombing. 

Press, T. A. (2015). Boston Marathon Bombing. Mango Media. 

Illustration
Cite this page

Select style:

Reference

StudyBounty. (2023, September 14). Intel Briefing on Boston Bombing.
https://studybounty.com/intel-briefing-on-boston-bombing-speech

illustration

Related essays

We post free essay examples for college on a regular basis. Stay in the know!

17 Sep 2023
Criminal Justice

Research in Criminal Justice

Research is the primary tool for progressing knowledge in different fields criminal justice included. The results of studies are used by criminal justice learners, scholars, criminal justice professionals, and...

Words: 250

Pages: 1

Views: 165

17 Sep 2023
Criminal Justice

The Art of Taking and Writing Notes in Law Enforcement

Every individual must seek adequate measures to facilitate input for appropriate output in daily engagements. For law enforcement officers, the work description involving investigations and reporting communicates the...

Words: 282

Pages: 1

Views: 182

17 Sep 2023
Criminal Justice

Justice System Issues: The Joseph Sledge Case

The Joseph Sledge case reveals the various issues in the justice system. The ethical issues portrayed in the trial include the prosecutor's misconduct. To begin with, the prosecution was involved in suppressing...

Words: 689

Pages: 2

Views: 252

17 Sep 2023
Criminal Justice

Victim Advocacy: Date Rape

General practice of law requires that for every action complained of there must be probable cause and cogent evidence to support the claim. Lack thereof forces the court to dismiss the case or acquit the accused. It...

Words: 1247

Pages: 4

Views: 76

17 Sep 2023
Criminal Justice

New Rehabilitation and Evaluation

Introduction The rate of recidivism has been on the rise in the United States over the past two decades. Due to mass incarceration, the number of people in American prisons has been escalating. While people...

Words: 2137

Pages: 8

Views: 140

17 Sep 2023
Criminal Justice

Justification of Reflections and Recommendations

Credible understanding and application of criminal justice require adequacy of techniques in analyzing the crime scene, documenting the shooting scene, and analysis of ballistic evidence. The approaches used in...

Words: 351

Pages: 1

Views: 127

illustration

Running out of time?

Entrust your assignment to proficient writers and receive TOP-quality paper before the deadline is over.

Illustration