If appropriate, interpret the effect of alcohol intoxication on homicide vs drug offending . If it is inappropriate to interpret the effect, explain why not.
From the analyzed data the coefficient of alcohol intoxication is 1.280. This result implies that a unit increase in alcohol intoxication causes 1.280 increase in homicide vs Drug which is the dependent variable. However, the p-value of the study is 0.07 which is greater that significance level 0.05. This means that the coefficient is not statistically sufficient.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
If appropriate, interpret the effect of less than once a month drinking on burglary vs. drug offending . If it is inappropriate to interpret the effect, explain why not.
The coefficient of less than once a month drinking is -0315. This implies that there is inverse relationship between burglary vs drug offending. That is, as less than once a month drinking increases robbery vs drug offending reduces. The p-value, in this case, is 0.18 which is greater that significance level (0.05). This means that the coefficient is not statistically significant at 95% confidence level
If appropriate, interpret the effect of black race on assault vs. drug offending . If it is inappropriate to interpret the effect, explain why not.
Black race coefficient is -0.921, which means that as reduce assault vs offending drug increases. Precisely, a unit increase in black race causes 0.921 decreases in assault vs drug offending. The variables p-value is 0.07 which is higher than the significance level 0.05. This result indicates that the coefficient is not statistically sufficient at 95% confidence level. Since the value is statistically insignificant, it is not appropriate to include it in the forecasting model.
If appropriate, interpret the effect of drug intoxication on robbery vs. drug offending . If it is inappropriate to interpret the effect, explain why not.
The coefficient of drug intoxication on robbery vs drug offending is -0.361. This means that there is an inverse relationship between the two variables, such that, as one increase, the other one reduces. A unit increase in drug intoxication causes 0.361 decreases in robbery vs drug offending. The p-value for this coefficient is 0.06 which is higher than alpha (0.05) hence meaning that the coefficient is statistically insignificant.
If appropriate, interpret the effect of prior violent conviction on burglary vs drug offending . If it is inappropriate to understand the effect, explain why not.
The coefficient between these two variables is 0.191 which implies that there is positive linear relationship between them. A unit increase in prior violent conviction caused 0.191 increase in burglary vs drug offending. The p-value coefficient here is 0.07 which is higher than alpha (0.05) hence the coefficient is not statistically significant.
