Norman Daniels advocates for the right to health care in strongest terms. He derives his arguments to the right to health care from the justice principle and the fair equality of justice which was developed by John Rawls. Daniels states that people who are ill, lose their ability to function as human beings and they end up being restricted from seizing the open opportunities that are presented to them over time ( Daniels, 1983 ). People have the right to be treated equally and fairly in all manner, by denying them the right to health care means that they might fall sick and fail to use the opportunities that are presented to them equally as compared to those people who are healthy.
There have been debates on the moral and legal rights regarding the issue of health care provided to individuals. It can be noted that the constitutional rights do not take into considerations the needy individuals who might not have signed up for the health insurance cover. However, the right to health care is a definite right and has an obligation to those who can assist those who are not able to access quality healthcare ( Norman, 2017 ). Issues, such as who should pay for the healthcare need to be addressed through the available laws to ensure that each person achieves high-quality health care. By providing that each person, the poor and the rich have access to high-quality health care, health-related complications would have been dealt with. This way, a level field for the use of the opportunities that are available would have been developed. The society will be able to achieve the fairness and equality that is needed.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Daniels, N. (1983). Health care needs and distributive justice. In Search of Equity (pp. 1-41). Springer, Boston, MA.
Norman, D. (2017). Equality of What: Welfare, Resources, or Capabilities? 1. In John Rawls (pp. 169-192). Routledge.
