John Stuart Mill conveys an argument that there is no great difference between a science that concerns human nature and other types of sciences. The argument is found in ‘A System of Logic,’ which is one of his greatest books. In this book, Mill considered how different sciences developed. He traced their evolution journey from being non-exact to exact with the belief that any fact that existed could be placed as a subject of a particular science. In general, according to Mill’s view, any science could be turned into a perfect science. Concerning this argument, he described his understanding of human nature. After much studying, he concluded that the actions and impressions that human beings exhibit is not solely determined by the present circumstances but by a combination of the characters of the particular individuals and those current situations. He also clarified that the agencies which contribute to human nature are very many and diversified. Everything which a person has gone through during his lifetime affects the way that he or she reacts to a happening. Every tiny bit influences the result as asserted by Manicas (2006).
Therefore, going by John Stuart’s point of view, even though the actions and decisions that people make, just like other natural occurrences, are controlled by individual forces, they cannot be at any time predicted for any human being ( Mill, 1973). That is because when dealing with people, not every data is provided . In the case of psychology, if it were to be categorised as an exact science where all the data required for predictions of human behavior are provided , then the outcome could be accurately predicted even if the particular individual was to be made aware of the forecast. In such a situation, there must be a recalculation of the prediction which should be done because the person has been made aware of the speculation. Going by what Mill suggested, the act of revealing the prediction to the individual would be viewed as a part of the data which must be considered during calculation. However, in real life, it is impossible since all the data concerning a human being can never be obtained ( Mill & Williams,1993).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Manicas, P. T. (2006). A realist philosophy of social science: Explanation and understanding . Cambridge University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1973). Principles of political economy . Рипол Классик.
Mill, J. S., & Williams, G. (1993). Utilitarianism; On Liberty; Considerations on Representative Government; Remarks on Bentham's Philosophy.
