Social reality has been defined variously but mainly relates to the kind of reality in the world that is created through social interaction. It is, therefore, not a world that exists in itself, neither does it have any seeming permanence of state. Instead, its nature is determined by the nature, form, and substance of human interaction (Cornelissen et al., 2015). There is only one world but it can be looked at from many perspectives. Common examples of these worlds include the political world that is mainly made up of power and the economic world that is made up of money and commerce. The main building block of social reality just as power and money build the aforesaid worlds is language. Language in this instance refers to both the method and system of human communication. Language determines how people communicate and to what extent they comprehend one another, thus the level of interaction they will have and this, in turn, constructs social reality.
There is a common saying about everyone in the world having something that makes them tick. Every ne has what they believe is their reason for being in this world (Cornelissen et al, 2015). Some live for themselves, others for family and yet others for one cause or the other. Social reality is weakest at this initial state when everyone is driven by their own individual motive and aspirations. It should, however, not be considered that having individual aspirations is wrong in any way. It is when people start abandoning and/or neglecting their personal and individual motives and aspirations to take up a collective motive and aspirations that a social reality is formed. The perspective of the individual reduces in favor of the perspective of the collective and a social reality is formed (Cornelissen et al., 2015). The measure of social reality lies in how much the individual perspective gives way to the collective as well as how wide the collective is. The collective can be as small as a few friends or relatives, and as large as the entire world.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Language method determines whether people communicate, how much they communicate, and how well they understand one another. Humans are social beings and need to interact and language is the means through which this interaction takes place. For example, many people can live together in a community and they have a collective issue that disturbs them all. The solution for this problem can easily be arrived at when the people are able to communicate together and understand each other. In a manner of speech, this can only happen if these people speak one language. Language in this instance does not refer to dialect but rather the ability to come together and communicate socially and also arrive at a consensus. If these people ever physically come together, language will determine if they will leave that meeting as one social entity or a greater division will arise. Language method includes what is said, how it is said as well as how it is received and understood (Cornelissen et al, 2015).
The second perspective of language is the systems used to communicate. The very same community that has a problem may also be having a social media expert. This expert will connect every person in the community within a social network and commence communication about the problem. This will be easier and faster because people can interact without having to be physically together. Further, this individual may still use social media to rope together people around the county, state or even the entire nation who have a similar problem. Eventually, through the use of language methods and systems, an actual movement may be formed. A world that was erstwhile controlled by political power or financial might suddenly fall under the control of social interaction forming a massive and expansive social reality. Language is, therefore, the main driver for social reality.
Reference
Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review , 40 (1), 10-27
