Leadership and management are necessary competencies that add organizational value. Leadership is a process through which a company management mentors, develops, guides, and influences behavior towards achieving specific goals. In the process, leaders make quick and effective decisions and inspire their juniors to work at the highest levels possible in overcoming competition while increasing productivity. On the other hand, management in organizations refers to directing, governing, handling, deciding, and supervising company operations. In doing so, managers create, maintain, and control a working environment through which employees can work together in achieving specific goals.
The unusual governance process in higher education frequently blurs the line between management and leadership. Leaders maybe be more strategic while managers are tactical, but both concepts, in higher education, aim at achieving one primary goal, educational success, especially among students. However, leaders might be more concerned with student affairs in attaining the set vision and working towards a common goal. Therefore, higher education leadership might be more about planning, organizing, and coordinating to sustain student affairs flawlessly. On the other hand, management focuses on administering and ensuring that daily activities proceed perfectly. Consequently, higher education management focuses on directing, staffing, reporting, and budgeting towards meeting an institution’s needs.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Democratic leadership would be the best fist for individual personality. Unlike autocratic leadership style that relies on the “Do as I say” approach, democratic leaders always ask, “What do you think?” Democratic leadership offers a chance to share information and idea with employees about aspects that impact their responsibilities. It also seeks employees’ opinions before reaching a final decision. In doing so, democratic leadership would not only eliminate errors but also eradicate biasness in decision making. Moreover, the style would promote team spirit and cooperation as it allows creativity, growth, and development among employees; hence, simplifying the leadership process
