Security is one of the primary undertaking strived by any organization. The criminal justice system has a number of programs to manage homeland security. The main challenge affecting the effectiveness of criminal justice is the management and leadership concerns as organizational strategies. The main inquiry related to the comparison between management and leadership of criminal justice systems in matters relating to security issues. In most of the practices in the criminal justice system, there are challenges in differentiating between the roles and responsibilities of a manager and a leader. The main challenge is confusion between leadership and what it entails. The confusion arises from the concepts defining leadership include criminal justice supervision, administration, and power distribution ( Stacey, 2012 ). They are different interchangeable components revolving around leadership roles. On the other end, management entails the description of performances of operational functions. Therefore, in the criminal justice system addressing security concerns, a comparison between management and leadership proves management is the best for an organization.
The enhancement of security in the criminal justice system is dependent on management and administration practices. The provision of quality service approaches in the criminal justice field is influenced by the management programs put in place. Security is a global concern, demanding effective management concepts. Quality and efficient approaches guarantee the response to security concerns in the changing global criminal justice concerns. The management practices held by managers define the qualities of effective leaders, an element warranting management to be the best approach to be applied in the field of the criminal justice system.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The arrival at the best alternative in an organization, between management and leadership is shaped by an understanding of the various criminal justice systems and an evaluation of the current trends and concerns. Security deals with addressing and solving security concerns, both homeland and organizational. Leadership has less appreciation of technological coverages, as opposed to management. The use of technology is an effective and best practice in the criminal justice field, as it simplifies the monitoring of cybercrimes and other security concerns using electronic means ( Toor, & Ofori, 2008 ). The criminal justice field deals with addressing and solving security concerns, an element demanding the use of technological perspectives to increase the enactment of security measures. In this context, management becomes a significant and best approach to impact on the effectiveness of the criminal justice system. Management us ab essential practice in homeland security as it enhances the process of arriving at procedural justice, security policing, and curbing of insecurities.
Management shapes leaders. For an individual to be an effective leader, he/she must possess management characters. Management overlaps leadership roles in the criminal justice field. Security concerns are addressed by the various management practices incorporated. The criminal justice system, security to be specific, the motivation of success is based on management as opposed to leadership. Security management requires an understanding of the bureaucratic functions of a leader ( Whitman & Mattord, 2013 ). Management practices are an effective platform in the criminal justice field, as it solves the numerous challenges and obstacles faced by leaders. Security organizations are responsibilities for defining the characteristics of managers, who are tasked with the responsibility of managing criminal justice agencies. Management functions define the qualities of leaders. The operations of security concern under the field of criminal justice are essential in directing effective management. On the other hand, management outlines the required roles and responsibilities of leaders. Management defines the requirement of leaders in security concerns. Hence, management is the best for a security organization specializing in the criminal justice field.
Security is a global concern affecting every individual. Since security deals with the well-being of the general public, it necessitates the need to appreciate the contributions of leaders and managers. In security concerns, under the criminal justice system, philosophical approaches warrant management to be the best over leadership. Managers as opposed to leaders have the authority to influence the formulation of social systems to be utilized to develop specialized typologies to be used in the field of criminal justice ( Bolman & Deal, 2017 ). Managers are individuals with the desired skills to influence others by formulating security measures. The concepts of influence in the criminal justice systems overshadow the direction of authority. Management is the best for a security organization as it defines the social systems and organizational structures to be used in the field of criminal justice. Management influences the processes adopted in the security concerns as they outline the independent operations applied in the to achieve the objectives of security agencies.
In a nutshell, there are different arguments formulated in respect to management versus leadership roles in addressing security concerns under the criminal justice systems. It becomes hard to differentiate the two. in most of the cases, leadership is confused with administration approaches as other imprecise roles. Management in security defines the performance of leadership roles and the analysis of criminal justice performance reviews. Management is the best for an organization as has a positive influence in addressing security concerns. Additionally, management covers the operational definition of the leadership roles under the field of criminal justice in addressing security measures.
References
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership . John Wiley & Sons.
Stacey, R. (2012). Tools and techniques of leadership and management: Meeting the challenge of complexity . Routledge.
Toor, S. U. R., & Ofori, G. (2008). Leadership versus management: How they are different, and why. Leadership and Management in Engineering , 8 (2), 61-71.
Whitman, M., & Mattord, H. (2013). Management of information security . Nelson Education.
