From the readings about the concept of literacies of praxis, I have learned that it is essential for learners to be able to build and maintain an open mind whenever they encounter varied perspectives. Additionally, a learner is inclined to seek out the characteristics of information products which indicate the underlying creation process. This allows such a learner to articulate the capabilities and constraints of information that are developed through the various creation processes. Lastly, I have also learned that information has value, and it is critical that a learner respects the original ideas of others since in every diverse perspective lies some value that could be channeled for productivity. To achieve maximum value, learners should perceive themselves as contributors to information as well, not just consumers.
After reading and analyzing the ACRL's respect frameworks for literacy and Eshet, the skills I need to further work on include my researching skills. I am aware of the role research plays in creating information that is concise and logical. However, I have poor research skills which sometimes lead me to use sources of information that are not authentic, especially if they are readily accessible. I may need to learn how to invest time in research. The other area that I struggle with is how to develop socio-emotional digital skills. In this area, I find challenges in collaborating and forming relations through the discussion groups to share knowledge. By nature, I am a bit of a conservative in how I approach socializing which affects my collaboration and contribution in the groups.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In my quest to improving my scholarly skills, one area that I wish to improve on is my scholarly conversation techniques. I would like to engage and interact more within a community of scholars. For this reason, I spent half an hour with two of my colleagues in a group discussion. We were able to formulate, debate and weigh our insights against each other's before we finally wrote a group report. We compared this report against the individual reports we had earlier on written. The improved coherency of argument on the group report increased my understanding of the role the discursive element of scholarship plays in improving a scholar's argument. I learned that I need to work on my collaborative and team play skills to ensure I actively engage in future scholarly discussions.
