Lorena Bobbitt faced felony trial charges on January 10, 1994. The background of Lorena Bobbitt's case dates back to June 23, 1993. Lorena Bobbitt was married to John Bobbitt in 1989. However, the couple had faced many issues in their marriage, ranging from physical, emotional, and sexual abuse. For instance, details indicate that Lorena accused John of raping her on different occasions. Consequently, the differences between these couples resulted in an attack on June 23, 1993, when Lorena cut off John's penis when he was asleep. Consequently, Lorena was arrested to face trial. Therefore, the paper provides a detailed analysis of the case focusing on the charges presented, the evidence used by the prosecution, and how the defense attorney used insanity defense to protect Lorena.
The presented charges against Lorena Bobbitt
The prosecution team presented felony charges against Lorena. Markedly, the prosecution accused Lorena of cutting off Bobbitt's penis on June 23, 1993 (Chozick, 2019). The central claim is that Lorena had severed Bobbitt's dick, after which she left the house with the dick and drove away in her car. Moreover, the charges also claimed that Lorena had thrown the dick by the roadside, after which she informed the police about what had happened. Consequently, it is these events that influenced the felony charges that were presented before the court.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The evidence used by the prosecution
The prosecution used various pieces of evidence to present the case against Lorena. First, the main argument was that John Bobbitt never attempted to rape or initiate sex with Lorena that night. The prosecution team claimed that Lorena was the one who tried to initiate sex after Bobbitt returned from a drinking spree with a friend. Nevertheless, Bobbitt refused to engage in sex since he was too tired, according to the prosecution team (Chozick, 2019). Second, the prosecution team also presented evidence of Lorena's words from a police statement. Lorena had told the police that Bobbitt is selfish since he was the only one experiencing orgasms, after which he never allowed Lorena to have a similar experience. Therefore, the prosecution argued that this was enough evidence to prove that Lorena was guilty. The other evidence by the prosecution team focused on the fact that Lorena had left the house with the penis and had blood when she was arrested.
The defense attorney's strategy of using an insanity defense
The defense's attorney also presented various arguments to prove that Lorena had acted out of insanity. First, the defense team maintained that Lorena had experienced torture in her marriage, affecting her mental wellbeing. For instance, there was a claim that Lorena had experienced physical, sexual, and emotional abuse in marriage. The defense attorney maintained that Lorena's limited chances were still normal after these experiences since Bobbitt was violent and threatened her life (Moore & Worral, 2016). Consequently, this influenced Lorena to act out of insanity. Second, the defense attorney also claimed that Lorena could not remember what had happened that night. Lorena told the police and the court that she could only remember holding a penis later on while driving. Therefore, Lorena's claim never remembered severing Bobbitt's penis means that she acted out of insanity. These strategies by the defense attorney resulted in the jury acquitting Lorena based on the insanity defense.
Conclusion
The analysis has presented the details of Lorena Bobbitt's case. Markedly, the research indicates that the defense attorney granted the defendant freedom by using an insanity defense. Whereas Lorena was accused of severing John's penis, the jury concluded that she was insane. The prosecution team had already presented evidence proving Lorena's severing crime.
References
Chozick, A. (2019, January 30). You Know the Lorena Bobbitt Story. But Not All of It . Retrieved from The New York Times : https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/30/arts/television/lorena-bobbitt-documentary-jordan-peele.html
Moore, J., & Worral, J. (2016). Criminal Law . New York : Pearson Publishers .
