Part 1: Mineral and Rock Identification
Minerals
Mineral |
Luster |
color |
Hardness (Mohrs) |
Cleavage and fracture |
Streak |
Special characteristic |
|
1 |
Fluorite |
Vitreous |
Pale green |
4 |
Rounded streak |
white |
Fluorescent |
2 |
Feldspar |
Vitreous. Pearly on some cleavage faces |
White grey |
6 |
Perfect in two directions |
white |
Igneous rock |
3 |
Hematite |
Black to steel-grey |
Dark grey |
5 |
None |
Red to reddish brown |
Magnetic when heated |
4 |
Pyrite |
Metallic color |
Brass yellow |
6 |
Breaks with a conchoidal fracture |
Brass yellow |
Brittle and flaky |
5 |
Milky Quartz |
Vitreous |
Milky |
7 |
Conchoidal |
None |
Dissolves in acid |
6 |
Calcite |
Vitreous |
White, colorless |
3 |
Perfect, rhombohedral |
White |
Bubbles in acid |
7 |
Mica-Muscovite |
Pearly to vitreous |
Thick specimens: brown Thin: colorless |
2.5 |
Perfect |
White |
Rock-forming mineral |
8 |
Magnetite |
Metallic to submetallic |
Black to silver grey |
5 |
None |
Black |
Magnetic |
9 |
Gypsum-alabaster |
Pearly |
Clear, colourless, white |
2 |
Flat sheet-like |
White |
Sedimentary rock |
10 |
Talc |
Pearly |
Green, white, brown |
1 |
Perfect |
White |
Very soft and waxy |
11 |
Halite |
Vitreous |
Colorless, white |
2.5 |
Perfect, cubic |
White |
A natural salt |
12 |
Mica-Biotite |
Vitreous |
Black, dark green |
2.5 |
Basal, perfect |
White to grey, flakes produced |
A rock-forming mineral |
13 |
Graphite |
Metallic, earthy |
Steel gray to black |
1 |
Perfect in one direction |
Black |
Smudges on hand |
14 |
Gypsum-Satin Spar |
Vitreous |
Clear, colorless, white |
2 |
Perfect |
White |
fibrous |
15 |
Gypsum-Selenite |
Vitreous |
Clear |
2 |
sheet |
White |
Mica-like |
Rocks
Rocks |
Color | texture | Hardness | Composition | Grains/crystal | |
1 | Obsidian | Black or blackish green | Fine-grained | 5 | Felsic, SiO 2 | None because it is Amorphous |
2 | Granite | white | Porphyritic texture | 7 | Quartz and feldspar | coarse |
3 | Basalt | grey | Fine Grain | 6 | Similar to gabbro | Fine Grains |
4 | Pumice | Beige or grey | 6 | Feldspar, augite, hornblende, and zircon | Very fine-grained | |
5 | Rhyolite | Dark grey | 6 | Quartz, plagioclase, sanidinde, | Fine-grained | |
6 | Shale | Earthy tones | Clastic (fragmental) | 3 | Mostly quartz, feldspar and clay minerals | Less than 0.0004 cm |
7 | Calcareous Tufa | Brown | Chalky texture | 2.5 | Calcium carbonate | Fine-grained, soft, and porous |
8 | Sandstone | Pink and red | Clastic (fragmental) | 6-7 |
Mostly quartz, feldspar and clay minerals |
0.2 t 0.006cm |
9 | Conglomerate | Earthy colors | Clastic (fragmental) | 3 | Mostly quartz, feldspar and clay minerals | Pebbles, cobbles embedded in sand |
10 | Limestone | Earth stones | Bio-clastic | 3 | Calcium carbonate | Microscopic to course |
11 | Slate | grey | Fine texture | 3 | Fine, microscopic clay or mica | Fine-grained |
12 | Marble | white | Finely crystalline to medium or coarse texture. | 2.5 | Calcite, or dolomite | Fine-coarse |
13 | Quartzite | white | Crystalline texture | 6 | Quartz grains fuse, Sandstones | Fine to coarse |
14 | Gneiss | Brown, white | Crystalline texture | 7 | Light colored quartz and feldspar | Coarse-grained |
15 | Schist | grey | Schistose texture | 4 | Chloride, biotite, muscovite | Coarse-grained |
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Answer the following questions:
Explain the rock cycle.
This is the process in which rocks are continuously transformed from one type of rock to another. The three types of rocks include igneous rocks, sedimentary rocks, and metamorphic rocks. These three types of rocks transform, and the changes they undergo is what constitutes the rock cycle. Beneath the earth surface, rocks occur in the forms of magma. When the magma cools and crystallizes, it forms igneous rocks. Intrusive igneous rocks are brought to the surface through weathering resulting in the deposition of igneous sediments. These sediments are then compacted through the lithification process resulting in sedimentary rocks. The sedimentary rocks formed end up being buried back into the earth crust where the temperatures, as well as the pressure, are high. This results in the formation of metamorphic rocks. Because of the excess temperature and pressure, the rocks melts again creating magma making the cycle start again.
What did you find the most useful property to identify your minerals?
The most useful characteristics I found significant when identifying the minerals include the unique components of the mineral, like the taste, their magnetism, crystalline structure, as well as, their reaction with acids.
What was different about the components of your conglomerate and granite?
The fundamental difference between them is the texture. Granite is made up fair coarse grains while conglomerate is very coarse since it is made up large pieces of gravel. Gravel is an igneous rock while conglomerate is a sedimentary rock.
What was similar between your limestone and marble?
Marble is made of limestone. Thus, both of them are composed of calcite. Also, both of the two rocks react to acids.
What was different between your sandstone and quartzite?
Sandstone is a sedimentary rock while quartzite is a metamorphic rock. Also, sandstone is a make of sand, and its grain size is medium while quartzite is course material and composed of quartz and sandstone.
Describe the differences between the conglomerate, sandstone, and shale.
The fundamental difference between conglomerate, sandstone, and shale is on the texture and grain size of the rocks. The conglomerate is very course and is composed of visible pieces of rounded gravel. Sandstone is made up of sand particles which are medium in size and is slightly smoother. Lastly, shale is composed of very fine particles of sand and are very smooth.
What is similar and what is different about your granite and gneiss?
One of the similarities between granite and gneiss is that they are both course materials with two distinct minerals. However, granite is a metamorphic rock while gneiss is an igneous rock.
Part 2: Geologic time
Relative dating methods:
Using the diagram below, and the rules of relative dating, answer the following questions.
Which unit was being deposited when the fault happened?
Unit 10 was being deposited when the fault happened since it filled more on the right compared to how it filled on the left.
Explain why the funny line between units 3 and 4 is a disconformity and not an angular unconformity.
The funny line between unit 3 and 4 is not an angular disconformity. This is because other units would have been closer to unit 4 if it were an angular unconformity. However, there is a period that is missing in which erosion rather than deposition took place between units 3 and 4, indicating a disconformity.
Hypothetically, if the trees and ground at the top were covered by the ocean, and deposition resumed, what type of unconformity would be above unit 12, and why?
Since there is no deposition taking place, an unconformity would result. This results in the formation of a gap between that layer and the next.
Would unit 11 likely to be present when the fault happened? Why or why not?
No. As per the principle of crosscutting, unit 11 ought to have been affected by the fault if it was older than the fault. The fact that it was unaffected is a clear indication that it is younger.
Explain why units 1-5 were not deposited in this position
According to the principle of horizontality, sediments are generally deposited horizontally unless they are disturbed. Initially, the layers were horizontal until they were folded.
In some areas, faults are known to act as a petroleum trap. If unit 2 has oil, and unit 3 is shale, what part of unit 2 would you drill into, above or below the fault, and why?
The drilling ought to be done below the fault because the oil and gas. This is because the oil and gas well would dry up fast if the drilling is done above the fault.
Radiometric dating
Answer the following questions
In order to ascertain useful dates on rock units to help determine the age of major events. Your mission is to date what is thought to be a very old fossil with a volcanic ash layer immediately above the fossil. We do know the fossil is at least more than 300 million years old. Should we use carbon 14 to date the fossil, or uranium 238 to date the volcanic ash layer, and why?
Since the age of the fossil is more 300 million, it won’t be possible to find its age using carbon-14. This is because the half-life of carbon is 15730 years, thus, making it impossible to data a 300 million years old fossil. Uranium 238 has a half-life of 4.5 billion years. However, it can’t be used to date fossils because fossils do not contain uranium. Uranium 238 is only used to date volcanic rocks of very old age. Thus, neither carbon-14 nor uranium 238 can be used to date the fossil.
We find samples of an igneous rock demonstrate it has been through 3 half-lives. The test element has a half-life of 300 million years. How old is the rock?
If the parent isotope starts with 100 grams, but your samples yield only 6.25 grams of the parent isotope, how many half-lives have passed?
Therefore, the isotope has passed four half-lives.
What would unstable isotope be best to refine the date of bones found in a cave hearth built by humans between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago?
The unstable isotope that is commonly used Carbon-14. It has a half-life of 5730 years and can be used to measure fossils of up to 50,000 years. Thus, carbon 14 can best refine the date of the bones found in the cave built between 20,000 and 40,000 years.
Argue with the following: A stone tool fashioned from a chunk of obsidian yields a date of 3,000,000 years old, therefore, the tool was made by a human 3,000,000 years ago.
Just because the chunk of the obsidian yields 3,000,000-year-old doesn’t mean that the tool was made by humans 3,000,000 years, the origin of humanity is traced back to 2 million years ago. Thus, it doesn’t make sense that the tool was created by humans 3 million years ago — instead, the obsidian on the tool the age of the mineral when it was formed from crystallization of magma.