In "Moral Criticisms of the Market," Ken S Ewert has done whatever it takes in defending the free market from criticisms of "Christian socialists." His article talks of four objections, such as materialism, impersonal ism, individualism, and economic power (Palomera &Vetta, 2016). Ewert differentiates free market systems and anti-free market systems stating that free market systems allow people to pursue their own goals.
The critique on the market in Ewert’s Moral criticisms of the Market has been a fantastic job done defending the market. In this, I agree with the criticisms Ewert has carried out in his article. His perspective on Christian moral view of the free market having a shortfall is one thing to agree with. Christians have believed that in a free market, God's most desired thing in humans which was human character have been spoilt leaving people to indulge in excess on concerns involving individuals (Stoeckl & Luedicke, 2015).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
To these Christians, these free markets bring about sin since they promote selfishness. Increase in the number of commodities where people can choose from in the market has forced individuality, which has been on contrary to God’s plan for humanity (Brennan & Jaworski, 2015).
As Ewert has based his argument, it is in no doubt that sin has resulted primarily from the fall of humankind, which Christians fail to acknowledge. The market is morally neutral, as stated by Ewert, and this market is what provides the means to which wealth is generated, usable in carrying out charitable works. On market resource mobilization, it is agreeable that the market is not an oppressor of the poor as the individuals get to choose them and set their own goals. The morality of a person cannot be altered by economic systems but by a person's restraint in the expression of sin externally.
References
Brennan, J., & Jaworski, P., (2015). Markets without limits: Moral virtues and commercial interests . Routledge.
Palomera, J., & Vetta, T. (2016). Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept. Anthropological Theory , 16 (4), 413-432.
Stoeckl, V. E., & Luedicke, M. K. (2015). Doing well while doing good? An integrative review of marketing criticism and response. Journal of Business Research , 68 (12), 2452-2463
