Kalief Browder, an American, was arrested in 2010 at the age of 16 years in New York on claims of taking a knapsack and assaulting the victim in the Bronx. He was with other young men. Police were trapped and arrested them on an allegation of robbery (Hamilton, 2017). Hardly any weeks sooner, Browder had been blamed for run-ins fight with police and was being investigated. The court imposed a $3,000 bail, an amount the teenager could not raise. Subsequently, Browder was taken to Riker Island to await his trial. The district attorney requested and was issued with 31 adjournments because he was on leave while Browder waited (Hamilton, 2017). During the three years in jail, Browder underwent physical and emotional torture from guards and inmates, spending close to 17 months in solitary incarceration. Finally, Browder was realized after the prosecutor requested the judge to dismiss the charges. He left Rikers devastated and heartbroken; he ended his life in June 2015 after surviving two earlier suicidal attempts.
On the same day, Kalief was interrogated by a prosecutor and an officer but maintained his innocence. The following day he appeared before a judge and later learned that he would be charged with a robbery that he did not commit. According to Broyles (2011) , the judge set his bail amount at three thousand dollars that were high for the family to afford. As a result, the young boy was sent to be incarcerated at Rikers Island. During his time at Rikers, the accused rejected thirteen pleas. He was an innocent boy whose punishment was grave and severe, even if he did commit the crime. His rights that are enshrined in the constitution were violated in many ways. The constitution guarantees any citizens the right to a speedy trial ( Broyles, 2011) . In this case, Kalief's case was delayed over time because the prosecutor and the attorney did not declare they were ready. After all, the victim was not available for the patient.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The case of Browder is more than an infringement to the rights of a human being. He was tormented and segregated, which amount to the infringement of the American laws on jails. During the accused stay in Rikers Island, he was subjected to numerous unimaginable atrocities. He was forced to defend himself because of his small frame and stature and was assaulted by the prison system officials required by law to protect him ( Broyles, 2011) . He went through various subjection to abuse. His rights violated by spending several months in solitary confinement though promised on numerous occasions that he will be put on fair trial, which never came to be. He would prove his innocence. Years had passed in confinement, and Browder attempted to take his life away though he was not successful in prison.
To sum up, Browder did not deserve to go through what he faced. The American system of justice failed his quest for justice. His case had no reliable witnesses. Also, law enforcers were not honest with his case following his arrest, which was unlawful. His incarceration had nothing to do with the stolen items. Even with no evidence, the prosecutor did not want to let the case go, and Kalief had to spend more years in prison. He was forced to defend himself, always against the accusation against a system that knew he did not commit the crime. This can be seen as total biasness where those with autonomy misuse it.
References
Broyles, D. S. (2011). Criminal law in the USA. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Hamilton, M. (2017, March). Kalief Browder’s Brother Pushes Speedy Trial Reform in Albany. Retrieved from http://blog.timesunion.com/capitol/archives/273448/kalief-browders-brother-pushes-speedy-trial-reform-in-albany/
Schwirtz, M & Winerip, M. (2015, 8th June). Kalief Browder, Held at Rikers Island for 3 Years Without Trial, Commits Suicide. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/09/nyregion/kalief-browder-held-at-Rikersss-island-for-3-years-without-trial-commits-suicide.html?_r=0
