Summary
The reading "On Why History and Philosophy Matter." Preface to the Roots of Modern Environmentalism written by David Pepper basically explores in geography, gender, and feminism. There are discussions about ethnic groups and the nation, economics which entails planning and management of sensitive areas of the surrounding, feminist geography, as well as, paths of neighbourhood transition. These paths include crime and the race in the United Nations. David, examines how environmentalism rules the major parts of the most stable ideologies such as the logic positivism, and Marxism. In the reading he prefers eco-centrism which entails emotional and irrational beliefs about the nature and rights of people in the society promoting peace and harmony. Clearly, it consists of how people are encouraged to rely on themselves even producing small sales and having minimum technological impact. Notable, the article portrays all these as harmonizing factors of survival, obligation to duty and right of other people, and also justice.
Cultural Filter as Described by Pepper
According to Pepper’s reading, there is a history given of attitudes to environment and ideas on nature, in relation to modern environmental ideologies. It evaluates the environmental ideologies within historical, social, and cultural context. The author also addresses ideas about nature and how human being relates to it. He says that cultural filter has its basic component as science, which is valued so much by the individuals and the society at large. Pepper explains about postmodern notions of prejudice and the analysis of scientific ability that have improved the scientific ‘facts’ about nature, leading to the separation from their ideological and social context. Agreeably, David’s cultural filter constitutes of science, as the term itself comes from a social science background.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Influence to Perception of Environmental Issues
Science affects an individual’s perception of environmental issues as they have to justify the occurrence of different things using scientific facts. The fact that he places science in the middle of the society and trying to justify nature influences how people think and reason Thus, this leads to different social changes as people begin to think differently. Additionally, it offers a better understanding of one’s environment and the things that happen around them. As science develops, the more individuals get detached from their ideologies and their social beliefs as it improves one’s reasoning. It could be a positive or a negative thing in that, it leads to people dropping the negative and mythical ideas of the society. On the other hand, it is negative when it influences people to drop their ways of life and later ends up affecting them negatively. Undoubtedly, science affects how people perceives their environment as it separates them from their ideological and social context.
How this Might Play Out in Practice
The influence that science causes to how people perceive environmental issues is clearly evident. For example, it gives the difference between the real and the perceived environment. That is because man tends to think and respond to his surrounding as he sees it from a personal perspective. Thus, individuals are in a position to explain their specific actions and the options they choose. For instance, scientifically how man relates to nature is due to exploitation and domination and individuals can maximize this by improving technology. On the other hand, people think differently about how they relate with nature. Some believe in fate and from the environmentalist believes that, nature reciprocates
