The existence of UFO's is still subject to debate despite the numerous claims and counter claims over the years. This is the conclusion according to both arguments presented by Paynter and those who authored Project Blue Book. Both the articles dwell on the lack of scientific or concrete evidence that can demonstrate the existence of things that are alien to the planet earth.
Project Blue Book approaches this subject from the point of view where the claimants credibility is questioned. This is done by examining each report by comparing it to the factors that could give it relevance. The various government agencies therefore establish that most of the reported unidentified flying objects could actually be explained. The article waters down the existence of UFO's by explaining these phenomena as crashed aircraft on the wrong flight path, asteorites and falling meteorites or even the un announced launch of air balloons. This article tries to show that the unidentified objects are simply unexplained. The government shut down further inquiry because it proved to be a case of lack of information in most cases. This argument raises more questions than answers because the report does not address all the reported cases. Though majority of the sightings were explained, doubts were still cast because of the few cases that were not explained.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Paynter's account also concludes that the issue should be approached with some level of skepticism. He uses reports such as the Project Sign report that was presented by the US Military in 1948. This report claimed that aliens existed, yet they did not present any physical evidence supporting the claims. Paynter is more critical of such claims because unexplainable occurences do not necessarily mean alien activity. On this regard, his account is similar to that made by summary on the Project Blue Book report. His account becomes more convincing when he brings up the matter of faith. It is true that a person's mind can be programmed or convinced on the existence of something that is not real. This can then be the basis on which the crash of an air balloon may be reported as an UFO because the mind is already predisposed. This makes the second article the better argument.
The fallacy of appeal to ignorance makes the subject of UFO's difficult to rubbish. While it has been impossible to present concrete scientific evidence to prove the existence of UFO's, it is also just as hard to prove that they do not exist. After all, many things in science have been proven over the years. An example is the concept that the earth is round and not flat. For a logical person to be convinced that UFO's exist, they must be presented with physical evidence. This does not necessarily need to be something that meets the highest threshold of science. However, the object must be proven to be made of material that is not found on planet earth. This presentation needs to be authenticated because the earth is full of objects that are common to one region but are foreign to the other regions.
Proof or evidence needs to be something that is new to every region. In this day of digital outreach, it is easier to research such a finding because communication is easier. Once such an object is publicly broadcasted and tested in different scientific fields, it can then be proven to be a UFO. That being said, it would still be difficult to convince a skeptic on the existence of UFO's because of the concept of faith. Some people believe that UFO's do not exist despite the lack of scientific evidence on the same. This group will be biased and illogical because their prior experience are the basis for their faith.
