With an increase in population comes an extra strain on resources, an element that brings about significant inequality. In most instances, the scarcity of resources results in situations that call for decisions to choose between life and death as is the case with healthcare practitioners. For healthcare practitioners around the world, economic value is often placed on a human life with the objective of quantifying the outcomes of a fatality. In other words, while human life is considered priceless, the healthcare sector is often faced with the challenges of redistributing its resources to ensure maximum efficacy is attained in its life-saving duties. Infrastructural, economic and skill inadequacies often influence the decision-making process of healthcare practitioners.
Doctors have to make trade-offs with their patients to determine where support is terminated for one patient in order to save another. The complexity of such a decision has to be viewed in relation to an individual’s quality of life as well as the efficacy of healthcare alternatives available. While it is difficult to quantify the life of an individual, it is equally important to maximize the effectiveness of healthcare in saving lives. In this sort of dilemma, it is often resolved by doctors through the analysis of the burden of disease, cost of care as well as the available healthcare interventions. When the social, physical and emotional aspects of a patient are evaluated, it becomes possible for an objective analysis of a situation to resolve the dynamics of saving a life. It is important to note the fact that, the value of life is an element that introduces the aspect of rationality in the decision-making process of a healthcare facility, more so when faced with the hard reality of resource inadequacy.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
