Policymakers, the public, and health professionals are increasingly becoming aware of the significance of disease prevention, health promotion, and population health across quite a number of issues such as emerging infectious diseases, chronic disease management, emergency preparedness, and the impact of lifestyle and behavior choices, among others. Moreover, health care professionals are cognizant of the inadequacy of episodic acute care strategies against these issues. With this in mind, my patient’s history affirmed elements of enhanced clinical prevention routines pivotal for the provision of equitable care. According to history, the patient has had several disease screenings such as obesity, osteoporosis, sexually transmitted diseases, and colorectal cancer screenings. In addition, the patient has had behavioral and lifestyle screenings such as alcohol misuse screening and counseling screening, healthy diet and counseling screening, tobacco use screening and counseling, and depression screening. All these, show a harmonious relationship between the patient’s health history and clinical prevention, thereby confirming the dispensation of optimum care.
Patients require quality care that not only expedites the recovery process but also does so while rendering the necessary comfort to the patient. As a nurse, I would advocate for effective care by focusing on the need for the provision of services based on evidence-based guidelines and scientific knowledge (Brandrud et al., 2017). Effectiveness often decreases the margin for errors while also increasing success probability. Regarding efficiency, patients require the best resources. Therefore, to ensure the best possible outcome for patients, I would advocate for the maximization of resource usage in a manner that avoids waste and avails needed resources. In terms of equitability, the best advocacy strategy I would use is one that stands against personal characteristics discrimination. Attributes such as race, gender, geographical location, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status should not be a basis for the provision of health care. Ultimately, cost-effectiveness depends on quite a number of variables such as infrastructure fundamentals, care delivery priorities, and reliability, among others (Watson et al., 2018) . Once these are in check, health care becomes cost-effective for the patient.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Brandrud, A., Nyen, B., Hjortdahl, P., Sandvik, L., Helljesen Haldorsen, G., & Bergli, M. et al. (2017). Domains associated with successful quality improvement in healthcare – a nationwide case study. BMC Health Services Research , 17 (1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2454-2
Watson, S., Sahota, H., Taylor, C., Chen, Y., & Lilford, R. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of health care service delivery interventions in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Global Health Research And Policy , 3 (1). doi: 10.1186/s41256-018-0073-z
