In the understanding of healthcare deliveries in the society, the application of medical approaches based on the population factors addresses the healthcare service deliveries beyond the traditional biomedical models, thus showing the significance of cross-sectoral relationships in healthcare promotions. The concepts of establishing healthy relationships between the public health and the primary care sectors help explicitly in sorting the local health requirements for the affected population, thus increasing the health results. The concept of population healthcare deliveries includes various assessments in stages that include factors such as community risk assessments, intervention developments, implementation, and evaluation plans (Byrne & Pattavina, 2017). The purpose of evaluating the concepts of population healthcare deliveries implies the approaches that purpose in pointing out series of interventions from different sources that would facilitate the identified factors that are instrumental in developing the summaries of the specific population health risk. Therefore, this paper presents the evaluation of complete community risk assessments that is the initial step in the development of the population healthcare delivery project.
The first step in the development of the population healthcare delivery project includes the process of identifying hazards and risks in the population that might harm the community. The method consists of risks evaluation from hazards with decisions made on whether the current safety policies and procedures are safe and adequate for the population. The concepts of demographics and social determinants are essential in understanding the actual process of establishing and understanding the population healthcare delivery projects (Assari & Lankarani, 2017). For most people, the idea of healthcare is considered a personal issue; however, to ensure the safety of the public health statuses includes the focus of the entire population’s health standards for the public. Therefore, the inclusion of the social and demographic determinants in addressing healthcare issues makes the nation commit to understanding and address the full array of problems that influence health statuses in society. The social and demographic determinants address the healthcare standards on the economic, social, and cultural environment of the targeted population.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Also, the concept of the population healthcare deliveries includes the community infrastructure variables. The community infrastructure variables imply the analysis of the surveillance data collected for risk assessment practices. For instance, according to the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, the approach of public health surveillance is defined as the ongoing collection of population’s data systematically, analyze, interpret and disseminate the information of the specific data related to health practices that would be used for the actions on the public health thus reducing mortality and morbidity which in turn improves the health standards of the public. The surveillance techniques for the community risk assessment vary continuously depending on the objectives, scope, and methods applied (Rantsiou et al., 2018). Some are involved in tracking specific diseases such as specific commutable infections or types of cancer affecting the population. Others are used in monitoring the behaviors in society, health conditions, or activities such as childhood window falls, obesity, or smoking practices. The surveillance data is, therefore, essential in estimating the magnitude of particular challenges that determine the distribution of specific infection in the society as well as portraying a natural history of the illness (Rantsiou et al., 2018). The methods and data sources for surveillance systems include specimens obtained from the laboratories, notifiable diseases, sentinel surveillance, vital records, and administrative data systems.
The community risk assessment also includes the concepts of data collections and criteria valuations needed for the identification of quality and utility of epidemiologic data. With the continued assessment outcomes, an essential requirement is developing that is necessary for improving the application of epidemiologic data throughout the process of assessing human health risks that include the characterizing and understanding risks from the occupational and environmental exposure. However, significant uncertainty is experienced in the community risk assessment process that does not associate with the outcome of various epidemiologic studies (Lusardi et al., 2017). Techniques are existing to characterize the uncertainty applicable in advancing the relevance of the evidence assessed and efforts of risk characterization. From the application of data calculation and criteria assessment for quality and utility of epidemiologic data, various recommendations are developed to help in improving the utilization of the epidemiologic data in managing community risks in the population healthcare delivery.
Besides, the results of the risk assessment related to the health of the targeted population in the process of the community risk assessment include the understanding of four major components of successful population health delivery. The four significant outcomes from the community risk assessment related to the health of the targeted population include the concentration on primary health care, establishing a calm data-driven environment, leadership display by the physician, and the off- the radar disease management process. The emphasis on primary concern should not only provide comprehensive healthcare to the population of patients at risk in the population health model but also consider empowering the society to take significant responsibility in maintaining proper health practices to sustain their health outcomes. The second outcome includes the careful data-driven environment that implies that comprehensive data is an essential part of the health initiative among the identified population (Lusardi et al., 2017). The process is effective in managing the process of healthcare service deliveries. The leadership of the engaged physician is also an essential concept since the physicians are responsible for a more significant position of healthcare costs in the United States since most healthcare practices require the active order of the physicians. Therefore, including the physician leaderships in the population health initiative is essential to the successful necessary for effective population healthcare delivery.
Lastly, the application of screening tools in the community risk assessment is a useful structure needed in the proper implementation of the population healthcare delivery. The screening tools were established to facilitate the achievement of high-quality care. For instance, the use of health Information Technology implies one of the essential screening tools. It is a reliable and valid tool in an online resource system such as the Guide to reducing unintended consequences of electronic health records designated to help health organizations in anticipating, avoiding, and solving problems that occur when utilizing the electronic health records by providing practical troubleshooting resources and knowledge. The use of health IT is essential in maintaining essential and effective systems used in improving the identified community health risks (Chen et al., 2016). The suggested tool is reliable and valid in the screening process since it simplifies the ideologies on the use of technology systems to improve the health standards of the identified population. Therefore, the first step in the evaluation of the population healthcare delivery project includes the community risk assessment process that is necessary for establishing an effective healthcare service delivery.
References
Assari, S., & Lankarani, M. M. (2017). Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of physical and mental self-rated health across ten ethnic groups in the United States. International journal of epidemiologic research , 3 (12), 185.
Byrne, J., & Pattavina, A. (2017). Next-generation assessment technology: The potential and pitfalls of integrating individual and community risk assessment. Probation Journal , 64 (3), 242-255.
Chen, S. J., Chen, Y. J., Cheng, C. H., Hwang, H. F., Chen, C. Y., & Lin, M. R. (2016). Comparisons of different screening tools for identifying fracture/osteoporosis risk among community-dwelling older people. Medicine , 95 (20).
Lusardi, M. M., Fritz, S., Middleton, A., Allison, L., Wingood, M., Phillips, E., ... & Chui, K. K. (2017). Determining the risk of falls in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis using posttest probability — Journal of geriatric physical therapy (2001) , 40 (1), 1.
Rantsiou, K., Kathariou, S., Winkler, A., Skandamis, P., Saint-Cyr, M. J., Rouzeau-Szynalski, K., & Amézquita, A. (2018). Next-generation microbiological risk assessment: opportunities of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for foodborne pathogen surveillance, source tracking and risk assessment. International journal of food microbiology , 287 , 3-9.
