Empirically-supported treatment uses research and accurate findings in making sound clinical decisions. EBP is beneficial in nursing since it allows care providers to leverage reimbursements from insurance providers due to the nature of its effectiveness. Concrete knowledge derived from EBP practices helps improve nurse productivity with respect to good patient outcomes. It also helps solve clinical problems and improves the quality of care provided to patients ( Chong, 2018). Through their adequate scientific research, it shows which treatment modules are suited for patients and which do not and should be avoided. However, the numerous EBP data available may be confusing to care providers and contradictory to the nursing practice. In turn, it would be difficult to translate evidence into practice ( Chong, 2018) . The practice is also susceptible to human error since research is not always perfect and may not be done as it should be.
EBP is essential in nursing as it provides foundations to how care should be comprehensive and properly availed to patients and their families. It reduces individual bias to provide universal guidelines that work to improve overall patient outcomes ( Chong, 2018) . Working without guidelines and standards of practice that have been proven to be effective reduces quality care and increases the risk of missing out critical factors.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Avoiding contradictory and confusing research could be done through a careful review by experts on deciding on what to use as the standards of their practice. Various expertise should be involved to comprehensively ensure that the right EBP with minimal side effects has been chosen. Human error could also be reduced by evaluating an EBP against other similar studies to validate its effectiveness ( Tourish, 2015). Even though there can never be perfect evidence, an EBP that is close to perfection would be conceived as suitable for practice.
References
Chong, C. C. (2018). Pros and cons of clinical practice based on guidelines.
Tourish, D. (2015). Evidence-based management: some pros, cons, and alternatives. Handbook of Research on Managing Managers , 141.
