Among the voting methods studied this week, quadratic voting is my favorite following its suitability in selecting representatives of a given group of people. This voting approach supports the group’s decision by presenting a chance where they can select alternatives. The representatives are determined by the percentage of voters supporting them. For instance, when a group has only two alternatives for an election, they only need to cast their votes. When more than 50% of the voters support one candidate, then the voting system will select the candidate with more than 50% of the votes (Posner & Weyl, 2015). Following its effectiveness, this voting method is highly applicable for selecting presidents and other representatives in nations.
Despite the substantiality of the quadratic voting method, it is subject to the tyranny of the majority (Posner & Weyl, 2015). There are some instances where the majority selection might not favor everyone in the group. This method does not consider the opinion of the minority in the group hence this might be a disadvantage for my favorite method. Moreover, it might not be applicable in cases where the alternatives have equal votes from their voters. A good example is a case where the selected alternatives have 50% each of the votes. In addition, the method identified might not effective in a case where the voters weakly support an alternative.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The voting method still remains my favorite since the voter’s opinions are given the highest priority in the voting system. Quadratic voting follows the “majority wins” slogan that presents fairness despite the contradicting opinions from the lower percentage (Posner & Weyl, 2015). The voting method is also applicable when there are more than two alternatives, where the candidate who receives a higher percentage of votes is considered. The method is the best for group decision making that employs different voting methods to obtain the voter's opinions and makes the decision depending on the percentage of voters that support one of the alternatives.
References
Posner, E. A., & Weyl, E. G. (2015). Voting squared: Quadratic voting in democratic politics. Vand. L. Rev. , 68 , 441.
