Analysis
Quantitative analysis utilizes data to create utilizable information, statistical techniques will help turn data into useful information to aid with decision making. Quantitative analysis involves computational and statistical methods of analysis. Statistical techniques could either be descriptive or inferential. Data structure is a descriptive statistics technique that necessitates a researcher collect data from a number individuals or subjects. In this case the researcher will collect data from the Veterans at SCI Camp Hill Prison. The design used for the study was one group pretest-posttest design therefore the most appropriate technique would be t-tests. The pretest and posttest scores in this particular study cannot be matched therefore the one-sample t test will be utilized. The healthcare professionals were sensitized on the cultural needs of veterans with PTSD and the researchers will seek to find out if the training lead to improvements in the healthcare professionals’ knowledge. The simplest way to perform a one-sample t-test is by using the SPSS software to analyze the differences before and after the training. The second indicator will be practitioner logs that will determine the health outcomes of the veterans with PTSD. The one-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test is a non-parametric test used to determine if the median of the sample is equal to an existing theoretical value. The researchers in this case want to know if the program had an impact on the health outcomes of the veterans. Therefore they measure the health outcomes of the 132 veterans at SCI Camp Hill Prison before and after the intervention has been applied. The health outcomes might be measured on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 indicating the best health outcomes. The average is often expected to rise from the previous baseline. The Wilcoxon Sign Test can be performed on the SPSS software.
Qualitative data analysis is a procedure that seeks to limit and make sense of huge amounts of information from different sources that shed light on a research question that emerges. This is the process where descriptive information is interpreted and explained; these information can include interviews, documents, transcripts, surveys and pictures. Qualitative data analysis often revolves around the interpretations of a researcher. Since qualitative research depends on impressions from a researcher it is important that the analysis is systematic and researchers report their impressions in a transparent manner (Lewis, 2015). The process of reducing data is exploratory especially if coding techniques are utilized. Coding is a slow and repetitive process and a researcher is encouraged to rename codes during the process. The first level coding methods that will be utilized in the research include In Vivo Coding, Process Coding, Versus Coding and values coding. First level coding could be conducted manually where certain concepts are highlighted with different colors or included into a software package. After assembling the codes, the researchers will organize them into extensive categories. This process primarily involves determining the key themes from the current codes determined in the first level coding hence limiting them to a manageable number, establishing hierarchies in the themes and linking the themes through theoretical modelling (Silverman, 2016). The researcher could code the results of the healthcare professional sensitized on the cultural needs of veterans with Post-traumatic-stress disorder. An awareness rate of than 95 percent could be gathered from the practitioner logs of veteran health outcomes and interviews.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Mixed methods and triangulation involves comparing and contrasting after collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. The integration of both methods can provide an extensive comprehension of the research subjects. Incorporating both methods allows researchers to triangulate findings that can enhance validity and improve the utility of work. Triangulation is the process of comparing a number of sources and methods to confirm finding. Triangulation often improves validity to the conclusions. The researchers in this study could incorporate the quantitative methods to describe the change influenced by the program on healthcare professionals and veterans with PTSD while qualitative research provides an in-depth comprehension of the cultural and social context of PTSD among veterans.
Interpretation
Interpreting results is significant since it provides meaning to the information collected and ascertains the conclusions, significance and implications of the findings. The collection of data often culminates to this procedure. The interpretation of the findings will be conducted by social workers and healthcare professionals. The qualitative data is often interpreted through descriptive methods; it is necessary that this type of data is coded as outlines in the previous section to interpret the results efficiently. The interpretation of data often involves comparing and contrasting of available data, determination of data outliers and future predictors. The data interpretation of data. The interpretation process often includes recommendations to aid employees to enhance the program and conclusions about the program. The interpretation process culminates with the process of recording conclusion and recommendations in a report for the reporting process.
Reporting and Dissemination
Use of Results
The results of a research are only as significant as how well they are put into practice to enhance the outcomes of the program. Post-traumatic stress disorder is prevalent among veterans often resulting to poor health outcomes. The main objective of the program was to sensitize healthcare professionals on the cultural needs of veterans with PTSD at SCI Camp Hill prison and eventually improving the health outcomes of the veterans. The results collected in the course of this research will help be significant for all the stakeholders mentioned in the research and the general public. The results will be utilized to help veterans achieve better health outcomes if the health care professional are sensitized. The results will be useful for healthcare proffesionals since it will help them recognize the need to be culturally aware to the needs of veterans when dealing with them. The recommendations of this research could be adopted for all health care professionals if they are to help veterans with PTSD. The findings of this research are presented on a balanced perspective hence it would be useful if applied by social workers in their work with veterans.
Dissemination
Dissemination is the process that involves consideration of target and the setting in which the finding are received and where appropriate interacting with policy makers and health service audiences in a manner that enhances research uptake. Effective dissemination often involves getting research findings to stakeholders who could make use of them to ensure that the ultimate benefit of the research is achieved. The stakeholders identified in the research are the veterans association, veterans, SCI Camp Hill prison and prison guards. The veterans were engaged in face to face interaction therefore the dissemination of the research findings will be conducted in the same manner. The Veterans Association was mainly engaged through online correspondence on the progress of the research therefore they will receive the findings of the research as a soft copy document. The prison and staff members will be engaged on the findings of the research through face-to-face presentation at the prison facility. The Veterans Association will be instrumental in disseminating the findings through listserv e-mail. The findings of the research will be disseminated to the health care professionals through a face-to-face presentation.
References
Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health promotion practice , 16 (4), 473-475.
Silverman, D. (Ed.). (2016). Qualitative research . Sage.
Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2017). Research methods for social workers . Pearson.
