Article 1
APA reference:
Patel J.C., Khurana P., Sharma Y.K., Kumar B., & Ragumani S. (2018). Chronic lifestyle diseases display a seasonal sensitive comorbid trend in human population evidence from Google Trends. PLOS One Journals: 13(12): e0207359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207359
Is this study quantitative or qualitative? How do you know?
The study by Patel et.al (2018) is qualitative in nature. The reason being the case study used secondary research mainly made up of previous research papers. In fact, the author concentrated on the abstracts of 2976 relevant papers to determine the chronic lifestyle trend in the human population.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Where does your study fall on the levels of evidence hierarchy? Explain.
On the hierarchy of evidence, the study above falls under level 1 that is a systematic review. A systematic review entails the collection and critical analysis of empirical data that meets the set criteria (Burns, Rohrich, & Chung, 2011). Patel et.al (2018) case study concentrated on data mining, selection, and extraction from previous studies that addressed the issue of chronic diseases. Their study used abstracts from previous studies to obtain all relevant data for their research, which was then analyzed and validity determined. For this reason, Patel et.al (2018) study is termed as level 1 since it entailed systematic analysis of applicable past studies to give their verdict on the subject matter.
Article 2
APA reference:
Li Y., Pan A2, Wang D.D., Liu X., Dhana K., Franco O.H., Kaptoge S., Di Angelantonio E., Stampfer M., Willett W.C.,& Hu F.B. (2018). Impact of Healthy Lifestyle Factors on Life Expectancies in the US Population. Journal of American Heart Association; 138:345–355. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032047
Is this study quantitative or qualitative? How do you know?
The study by Li et.al (2018) can be described as qualitative in nature. First, the research relied entirely on three main case studies, which are Nurses’ Health Study, Health Professionals Follow-up Study and National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys to determine their claim that lifestyle factors have an impact on life expectancies. All three studies that Li et.al (2018) relied on are secondary sources. It is for this reason, the research falls under qualitative study.
Where does your study fall on the levels of evidence hierarchy? Explain.
The study falls under the level V hierarchy of evidence. The researchers carried out Meta-synthesis review of three main case studies to address their research question. The three studies that Li et.al (2018) relied on were surveys conducted by the different researchers to ascertain their claims. The findings of the three studies on the issue of lifestyle impact on people life expectancies are what Li et.al (2018) based their argument and conclusion. The fact that Li et.al (2018) research mainly relied on a systematic review of three case studies makes their study fall under level V hierarchy of evidence.
References
Burns, P.B., Rohrich, R.J., & Chung, K.C. 2011. The Levels of Evidence and their role in Evidence-Based Medicine; 128(1): 305–310. Doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171
Li Y., Pan A2, Wang D.D., Liu X., Dhana K., Franco O.H., Kaptoge S., Di Angelantonio E., Stampfer M., Willett W.C.,& Hu F.B. (2018). Impact of Healthy Lifestyle Factors on Life Expectancies in the US Population. Journal of American Heart Association; 138:345–355. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032047
Patel J.C., Khurana P., Sharma Y.K., Kumar B., & Ragumani S. (2018). Chronic lifestyle diseases display a seasonal sensitive comorbid trend in human population evidence from Google Trends. PLOS One Journals: 13(12): e0207359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207359
