The article by Son and colleagues (2020) examines the importance of resilience during emergency happenings or disasters. The author's review presents a synthesis and summary of the literature investigating the concept of resilience within the emergency management (EM) context. These researchers were able to come up with four groups of results in their synthesis. The findings are definitions, technical tolls, key dimensions, and research settings of their research work. The first evaluates the definition of resilience adaptation. The second section explores the four dimensions of resilience in emergency management. The dimensions are; team decision making, collective sense-making, harmonized work-done and work-imagined, coordination, and interaction. The third part of the article review identifies the five technical tools used for enhancing EM resilience. These tools are mobile apps for communication, event history logging, mapmaking, decision support tools, and integrated information management system. The fourth part of the article evaluates the major design of emergency simulation features such as participants' roles and incident scenarios. The researchers propose directions for future research in each of these findings aimed at improving EM resilience. The authors have presented their research question and have gone ahead to answer it. The author's objective is to fill in the knowledge gap of examining the definition of resilience among other related constructs. They also explore the necessary tools needed for the achievement of resilience performance in EM. They answer these questions by exploring a range of literature on resilience in EM. The authors clarify that most studies in the past have explored the importance of resilience in dealing with unexpected events. Still, none has ever explored resilience within the EM domain, yet it calls for greater attention because of the increasing catastrophic events we see today. Yes, the authors have explored ways to make new connections and a new way to look at the problem. The source acknowledges the importance of RE theory that calls for monitoring what happens within a system. Such monitoring is a crucial aspect of resilience because it looks at the system's cognitive processing of data and information. The authors link this cognitive process in EM practice to read from a common picture for the collective knowledge of shared incidents amongst responders.
Conclusions
The conclusions are derived from the four interrelated and essential categories of the findings from literature reviews. Therefore, the conclusion is relevant to the issue under investigation. The arguments are of great value because they help answer the research questions on resilience's definition and tools. The article clearly states out the limitations, including a narrow scope covered. I believe the study has comprehensively covered all the limitations of this study.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Son, C., Sasangohar, F., Neville, T., Peres, S. C., & Moon, J. (2020). Investigating resilience in emergency management: An integrative review of the literature. Applied Ergonomics , 87 , 103114.
