There are different resources and rules that can apply to both parole and probation. Both parole and probation are the best alternatives to captivity in different correction centers. Parole occurs during early release from prison, while probation occurs prior to the jail. In other terms, probation can be the period of supervision by the community ordered by the court as castigation for the criminal. Parole refers to the period of community supervision during the early release of an individual. The resources available for the rehabilitation of individuals in the rehabilitation center include proper treatment tools, local sanctions, and educational resources necessary to carry out activities. Approximately 2 million individuals are detained in federal, local, and state correction facilities (Bratina, 2017). The individual in community-based correction can learn how to make the right choices in life, and also proper resources like enhancement of social skills impact a lot the person. All programs in the parole and probation are implemented fully through the use of available facilities and resources.
Parole and probation self-assessment checklist can have developed to consider the current state of individuals in community-based corrections. These centers target the risks to reduce the several misconducts in those individuals. The checklist can be printed to demonstrate skills learned in those centers. If the individual does not come without seeking permission from those in authority is considered absent minus leave, and therefore a felony charge of escape will be imposed on the individual (Chablani & Marques, 2019). This is only achieved by the use of a checklist to show the correct number of individuals present and absent. Continuous absence and termination from the program may result in imprisonment. A well-designed toolkit that is properly structured can guide the assessment of different individuals, not excluding paroling and probation authorities.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Strategic management and planning resources in the community-based corrections shortfall in most cases does favor the response of different individuals. Limited contraband leads to innate addiction, which serves as the biggest resource threat facing correction centers. Privatization and gang activity resources hinder effective response from individuals within the centers. A lot of people are advocating for reforms in the correction centers to meet the required use of suitable resources in the rehabilitation centers (McCarthy et al., 2016). Legal access to suitable counseling in those centers is limited because proactive resources against security against violence in those community-based corrections are limited.
This leads to the poor acquisition of proper resources needed for the individual's developmental ability within the system. Inadequate access to anti-social relationships and low sustainable educational resources hinders poor response within those centers. Furthermore, cell phones and drones as resources in the correction centers create danger in responses between the persons in the rehabilitation centers and the staff hence leading to poor working relationships. The use of drones and phones in the community-based corrections facility provides limited options that divert attention between the individuals in the system (Fajriando & Indonesia, 2019). For effective responses in the corrections centers, all distracted shall be eliminated to promote good working relationships and proper acquisition of required skills.
The use of place-centric data can be used to support the roles or involvement of individuals in rehabilitation centers. The use of occupational therapy, language and speech therapy, and physical therapy can support the individuals' and staffs’ roles regarding their involvement in the correction centers. Mental health corrections centers use cognitive therapy data to provide physical and self-care skills to promote their advancement in the acquisition of psychological counseling and training (McCarthy et al., 2016). Community-based corrections facility is formulated based on the individual data in designing positive and effective behaviors between different individuals.
Positive involvement results in lifestyle changes, which in turn leads to decreased chances of continued criminal behaviors. Programs designed by centers basing on the given data give criminals a chance to remain in their centers. Issues like anger management, substance abuse, making wise decisions, and offering educational programs are provided relying on the resources and data available (Chablani & Marques, 2019). Those issues are further implemented and promote individual involvement in the program. Criminals can identify suitable resources based on the community corrections data to benefit them in completing the program and have a chance to go back into the community. Susceptible data that gives general predictive of recidivism can be used to measure and dictate different roles of people within the corrections centers. Likewise, the data results from resources used, which shifts civic resources from social and health support, can panel the system to enable individuals’ progressions regarding the abilities to acquire positive behaviors in their developmental milestones.
The use of single authenticated assessment tools can be used based on the data to reduce public safety risks resulting from people in the community-based correction centers. Merely, completion of community-based corrections requires tiresome involvement in the system to complete necessary roles dictated to the individuals (Bratina, 2017). Therefore, proper management of time in those centers promotes successful completion through using learned skills to see individual reentry into the community.
References
Bratina, M. P. (2017). Intercept Five: Community-Based Corrections and Support Services. In Forensic Mental Health (pp. 239-254). Routledge.
Chablani-Medley, A. & Marques, L. (2019). Community-based implementation of a paraprofessional-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy program for youth involved with the criminal justice system. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved , 30 (2), 841.
Fajriando, H., & Indonesia, H. A. M. R. (2019). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Community-Based Corrections di Lapas Terbuka Kelas III Rumbai. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum. https://doi. org/10.30641/kebijakan, v13.
McCarthy, P., Schiraldi, V. N., & Shark, M. (2016). The Future of Youth Justice: A Community Based Alternative to the Youth Prison Model.
