The article posits that various clinical approaches that support healthcare personnel in clinical practice. Such approaches affect various aspects of health care delivery that include but not limited to the construction, execution, and functions, and goals of the healthcare systems as overseen by the medical practitioner. It acknowledges that health care personnel often face various ethical challenges and dilemmas in the course of their duties. The articles discussed clinical ethics consultation and the roles of clinical ethics committees. Additionally, it delves into the various clinical ethics approaches that include, but not limited to, clinical ethics committees, ethics consultation, ethics rounds, moral case deliberation, ethics discussion groups, and ethics reflection groups (Rasoal et al., 2017). Finally, it delves into the role of practitioners in ensuring ethical practice by promoting the protection of patient confidentiality and privacy in the course of health care delivery.
The principle or theory of beneficence stipulates that health care providers must do all they can for the benefit of the patient in all situations. It means that all treatments and procedures should be carried out with the objective to attain the most good for the patient. Towards this end, medical practitioners must develop and subsequently maintain a high level of knowledge and skill by making sure that they are trained in the best and the most current practices (Parashar et al., 2017). Additionally, they must consider the individual circumstances of the individuals, meaning that what is good for one patient may not necessarily be good for another patient. Secondly, health care providers should adhere to the principle of justice. The principle of justice stipulates that all medical decisions should contain an element of fairness. It means that the medical personnel should apply the relevant laws and regulations when making choices. The fairness should be evident in new treatments and take into consideration the element of the scarcity of resources.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The stated roles and theories are consistent with the provisions of Article 5 of the Code of Medical Ethics that states that the medical profession is that the service of society and humanity ( Riddick, 2003) . It means that practitioners should respect human dignity, life, and healthcare of the community and the individual, which is the primary duty of the physician. To attain the objectives and the moral dictates of the profession, the physician should handle all patients without discrimination and apply due diligence for all the patients. The same article further stipulates that the primary loyalty of a physician should be to the patient’s health that must come before any other convenience. It implies that the doctor, therefore, cannot refuse to assist a patient even in cases when a disease or the patient’s condition may pose a personal risk. Towards this end, a doctor should never hurt a patient intestinally. The doctor’s mandate is to assist the patient with competence and care by avoiding any undue delay in attendance.
The objective of nay care is to put the interest of the patient first, meaning that as a doctor one ought to respect the convictions of the patients and should not, at any point, impose their own beliefs and convictions on the patient. By acting correctly and delicately within the confines of ethics, laws, and regulations, the doctors will certainly be achieving the mandate of their profession (Brotherton et al., 2016). It means that doctor-patient confidentiality and patient privacy should be granted utmost priority. Doing such automatically makes the patient comfortable and enables them to divulge information that is relevant to the treatment thereby making the treatment and the recovery process effective and efficient throughout the care process.
References
Brotherton, S., Kao, A., & Crigger, B. J. (2016). Professing the values of medicine: the modernized AMA Code of Medical Ethics. Jama , 316 (10), 1041-1042.
Parashar, A., Chauhan, N., Gupta, R., & Kumar, V. (2019). Awareness regarding medical ethics in health care practice among the resident doctors in a tertiary care hospital of the sub-Himalayan region: a cross sectional study. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health , 6 (2), 708.
Rasoal, D., Skovdahl, K., Gifford, M., & Kihlgren, A. (2017, December). Clinical ethics support for healthcare personnel: an integrative literature review. In Hec Forum (Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 313-346). Springer Netherlands.
Riddick F. A., Jr (2003). The code of medical ethics of the american medical association. The Ochsner journal, 5 (2), 6–10.
