The case study presented involves Moe and Joe who are planning a social event that will host their friends and immediate family. The planning process involves locating a venue that will accommodate the invited members, providing food and beverages and ensuring the safety of the individuals invited. Moe finds an affordable venue although he is worried about its capacity. The worry is that the venue might not accommodate a huge number as anticipated. However, Joe seems to agree with any plan or suggestion raised by Moe. For instance, when Moe calculates the number of friends and their dates invited, Joe does not give an accurate answer but he considers that the venue will be fit for any number as long as he is the Mr. Party. Moe is much concerned with limiting the number in consideration of the available venue. Nevertheless, Joe is not concerned with the number but he is concerned with ensuring the invited members enjoy the party and have the best.
As defined by numerous concepts of social psychology, different theories and concepts are significant since they impact the choices and actions made by different individuals. The social behavior presented by individuals is goal-oriented. The preparation by Moe and Joe is oriented towards successfully hosting a large party for their friends. In the process, Moe and Joe tend to understand each other through a desire created by different aspects of social behavior. Throughout the case, Joe has the desire to maintain his status as Mr. Party and he is confident that being in charge of the party, the number of attendees does not matter most like the environment of the party. This case presents preparation for a party that involves immediate families and friends of the individuals in the context hence presenting the need to attract companions.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Additionally, the outcome of the event planning presented in the case is determined by the situation and interaction between the individuals. Moe and Joe behave differently regarding the identified venue. The reactions are characterized by Moe’s worry that the venue might not accommodate all their attendees while Joe is only concentrating on the party. This supports the fact that individuals spend a great deal of time considering their social situations. Among the social situations considered in this context include the number of individuals accommodated in the venue identified, their safety and the provision of food and beverages as well. Social interactions are necessary when forming our self-concept and perception of different social practices (Hagger, 2013).
Ethical concept
The case study presents different morals and ethics defining the individuals involved. Equivalence, an ethical concept is evident in the case study where the individuals planning the event aim at achieving or attaining a state of equilibrium in the state concerning the venue identified. Moe suggests limiting the number of friends who will attend the event since the venue might not accommodate all of them. On the other hand, Joe is concerned about the friends who might not be invited following the execution of Moe’s strategy of limiting the number of friends to attend. They both want to maintain equivalence in the party by ensuring that everyone invited will be accommodated in the event. The ethics of care are also identified in the context as Moe is concerned about the safety of the immediate family and friends who will attend the party. In addition, the interpersonal relationships between the family and friends invited are also put into consideration since Moe and Joe consider their friends and their dates too. Furthermore, this indicates great care for the friends and family as presented in the social concepts.
Critical thinking issue
The event planned in the case study requires a suitable venue that would ensure safety and good accommodation of the immediate family and friends invited (Thoresen & Mahoney, 2014). Since both Moe and Joe have friends and family members who must be invited for the event, it is reasonable to invite all of them. The capacity of the venue identified gives a limit of 50 people for this venue. Moreover, as more people attend the event in the venue, Moe is assured of a discount on the rental price of this venue. The capacity limit is defined under the safety basis so Moe is concerned about the safety of the members who will attend the party. On the other hand, Joe is concerned about the party to the extent that he is not familiar with the safety and financial details are presented by Moe. Therefore, considering the fact that the event is beneficial on a financial basis such that Moe will receive a discount on high attendance, the party should include everyone in the immediate family and the friends accompanied by their dates.
The social situation involved in the party planning event presents two different individuals who have different mindsets regarding the party. The party conditions as described by Joe present different feelings, actions and behaviors that will be present in the party under the influence of cold beer and him as Mr. Party. In order to ensure the accommodation of every individual, the party planners decide not to limit individuals who are expected to attend caring for their feelings and interpersonal relationships as well. Therefore, a person’s behavior is a clear indicator of their personality (Baumester & Bushman, 2017). Therefore, the two-party planners presented in the context have separate behaviors and conscience towards the immediate family and friends as well. Therefore, social psychology concepts are significant it develops the understanding of oneself and the family and friends characterizing the world around the person.
References
Baumester, R. F., & Bushman, B. J. (2017). Social Psychology and human nature (4 th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.
Hagger, M. S. (2013). The multiple pathways by which self-control predicts behavior. Frontiers in psychology , 4 , 849.
Thoresen, C. E., & Mahoney, M. J. (2014). Self-control: Power to the person. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA .