Operation and maintenance continue the path of achieving full-spectrum readiness in all the US army forces and advances the departments' multi-year approach for building a more lethal and ready force that is targeting investments. Readiness helps enable the army unit to have its ship, weapon system, or equipment capable of performing missions or the functions for which they have been designed or organized. The army regulation establishes and assigns the responsibilities to help in the maintenance of the army materials. Small unit readiness and maintenance are essential in the US army. As a senior maintenance noncommissioned officer (NCO), maintenance is at the forefront of every organization in the United States Army. The operational readiness rate is vital to the unit's success, and Leaders make sure that the unit equipment is fully mission capable (FMC) because one cannot be effective with a deadline or sub-standard equipment. If equipment is up to standard, it forces soldiers to own it and take pride in the equipment, ensuring soldiers have confidence in peers and Leaders.
Field maintenance and readiness activities help in cleaning equipment that have been identified to have the various biohazard evidence including the tissues and body fluid of a person. The commanders of field maintenance need to have the equipment for medical protection, water, soap, the higher pressure washer, steam cleaners, and other sources to help them perform the task ( Mingo & Viergutz, 2019 ). The commanders must increase the field maintenance activities and units with the required resources such as mortuary affairs, local chaplains, and medical teams.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The maintenance system of the army is made of two primary levels, field maintenance, and sustainment maintenance. The field maintenance helps in repairing the equipment for the user or the operator. The sustainment primarily helps in the equipment and component returns and repairs to the supply system. During maintenance transformation times, there is a blending of the partnership of all the US army material commander (AMC) organizations and the sources of repair to help meet equipment of repair. Besides, the field maintenance personnel help perform technical inspections of the materials in various classes to determine serviceability and completeness.
The army maintenance system’s second function is sustaining maintenance. It is having the characteristic of repair that is oriented on commodity of the various components and the end items that help in supporting the army. The operations assigned to the sustainment level maintenance activities and the units often include isolation, diagnosis, and inspection of fault repair in the components and modules according to the US army material command (MAC) (Valisetty et al., 2018) . The components that are returned and repaired to stock are always well repaired as the “National Maintenance Program (NMP)” requires. That process is involving inspection as well as diagnosis based on the requirements of maintenance work of the depot or any other technical directions that are similar. That helps identify all the components that exhibit tear and directs the adjustments or replacements of such items to the original equipment specifications.
The AMC may also give authority to the field maintenance units that are supported to help in performing the next repair of higher level whenever the supported units have the capacity and capability of performing the repair. Furthermore, there are several policies for sustainment and maintenance. For instance, sustenance maintenance meets the part of the mission for maintenance beyond field level capability (Tops et al., 2017) . Besides, sustenance maintenance is done in the depot environment. Particular depot-level capabilities sometimes can be deployed forward as necessary to the area of service in the army to help in the performance of particular tasks. The particular prioritized overseas installations coordinate with the AMC to help in performing the maintenance of depot that increases the procurement program.
The army maintenance operations and tasks are conducted in a priority sequence of maintenance mission established depending on the mission of the particular requesting organization and the relevance of the maintenance work importance that needs to be done. The importance and relevance of the maintenance have expressed an urgency of needs within the army's overall logistics management system ( Mingo & Viergutz, 2019 ). The requesting commanders help determine the appropriate priority of the maintenance on any requested work depending on the urgency of the organizational need designer (UND). Once they have selected the UND, the priority types such as 02 Priority deadline X, 05 Priority, and 12 Priority are used in identifying the best maintenance priority designator (MPD). The UND is used to assign the maintenance repair priorities whenever the ability of units and activities to perform their impaired assigned mission. Without such material, the activity or the unit may temporarily finish the assigned mission but minimized efficiency and effectiveness below the acceptable readiness level.
In conclusion, the army equipment meets maintenance standards when the particular equipment is a full mission capable and when all the faults are identified based on the prescription intervals and priority types such as 02 Priority deadline X, 05 Priority, and 12 Priority mentioned above. Besides, the standards apply to all equipment apart from those used as training aids that always need to be frequently assembled and disassembled. These maintenance standards are minimum conditions to which equipment must be restored by overhaul, repair, or some other function of maintenance to ensure it satisfactorily perform for a specific service period. Therefore, as a senior NCO, maintenance and readiness of all unit equipment in the US army should be put at the forefront. It is important for the success of the army units since all the missions depend on such equipment.
References
Mingo, J. B., & Viergutz, D. J. (2019). Army Materiel Maintenance Policy. Regulation , 750 , 1.
Tops, K., Manglus, G., Rooni, V., & Aia, T. (2017). Maintenance mechanism for army cable. In XI Master Students Conference Human and Engineering , 75. https://dspace.emu.ee/xmlui/handle/10492/3864?locale-attribute=en .
Valisetty, R., Haynes, R., Namburu, R., & Lee, M. (2018). Machine Learning for US Army UAVs Sustainment: Assessing Effect of Sensor Frequency and Placement on Damage Information in the Ultrasound Signals. 2018 17Th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) . https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla.2018.00032
