Self-influences on social cognition
Self-regulation is very important in the early childhood development as well as the adult's relationship and association with other in the society. The self-regulation requires an individual's to develop the ability to have his or her emotions managed and the body functions under control, and also have the attention and focus of such an individual maintained. Self-regulation is very paramount since it permits the children, as well as adults, have control over their behaviors, emotions and the attentions (Osborne & Jones, 2011). Self-regulation is very predominant among children. For instance, it enables the kids to have their mental habits monitored, for example, thumb sucking, walking to reach for what the toddlers require and many others. It also helps children, as well as adults, have their emotional behaviors under control. Control of hunger is an example in this case. It also enhances behavior self-regulation, for instance, remembering and cooperating with the set regulation is a good situation in this case. Lastly, it has a huge influence in developing cognitive functions in children and enhancing cognitive functions among the adults (Lombardo et al., 2010). Self-concept is very healthy to a human being with regards on how they associate or relate to each other. To have a favorable self-concept in a relationship, some factors need to be in place. The first factors are supportive family or peers. The positive self-concept in a relationship is accompanied with the support of the family which brings with it better socialization rather than isolation (Förster, 2011). Furthermore, economic stability is crucial in a relationship. The positive self-concept in a relationship comes with the confidence of being able to fund and afford the relationship with regards to income. Alternatively, education is critical in enhancing positive self-concept in a relationship as per Förster (2011). Where the peer or those parties in the relationship have a high level of learning, it would be more positive for anyone who is a party in the relationship to have the same degree of education. In this case, they would not be looked down upon nor will they be discriminated.
Influence of nature and nurture on cognitive development
The question of cognitive developments especially in the children is usually a matter of how it is shaped by the influence of nature and nurture. The term nature, when used according to Haworth et al. (2010) refers to the human being biological endowment that is the genes we receive or inherit from our biological parents. On the hand, nurture refers to elements of the environment that are the physicals as well as the social environment and how they influence people's development, the homes, schools, the womb, and those people who we have an opportunity to interact with ( Haworth et al., 2010). Cognitive development, on the other hand, is thinking development in the human being's life span. According to Haworth et al. (2013), the nature vs. nurture has raised many questions, and example in this case, is that is our intelligence due to our environment where we live or our genes? Nurture and nature contribute a lot to the cognitive development. Nature and nurture work together to have the cognitive development achieved. For instance, from birth, it is often noticed that children have a preference based on what nurture provide for them. Even a one-month-old kid would tend to look more keenly on their mothers faces more than any other women of same age ( Haworth et al., 2013). As children grow, they associate with their environment and its components, and this makes their cognitive development develop and grow even larger. This is brought about by a combination of genes from the parents and what nurture provides. These are books, they read, the friends they make and so on. Parents often determine the larger part of the development of children below five or ten years old. They chose for them where they play, schools they attend, and friends they should be with. This contributes a lot in their cognitive developments. However, it is worth noting that though some students are bright naturally which is partly played by nature, nurture plays a significant role in this case since the more the children read, they more they become better in reading in the future ( Stotz, 2010). All these are possible and contribute to cognitive developments due to the influence of nature and nurture.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The self-influences on social attention
In many occasion, we are often destructed by some issues as we are concentrating on others. For instance, one may be browsing or reading from a computer then suddenly get destructed by questions or pop in message or picture. As asserted by Colzato et al. (2012), these things which grab our attention must have certain features to enable them to appear unique to us. For instance, what catches our attention must be something we have been in need of for some time. These are things which we are either aware of or not, however, our mind has been in constant search for them to have our critical need fulfilled. Alternatively, what grabs our attention must be incredibly cute whether it is an item or human being. Lastly, what catches our attention is something we can't understand or something unique. An example, in this case, is when one searching for an answer to a question on the internet, they will probably stop when they get a page which has an answer to this issue. This will automatically grab their attention. Verbal expression is spoken word and manner at which they are expressed ( Förster, 2011). On the other hand, none verbal is defined as the silent communication. Verbal communication will influences attention based on what is being communicated with regards topics. In the verbal cues, the uniqueness of the entire matter matters as well as the eloquence of the speaker. Also, the speaker master and use of paralinguistic also contribute a lot to the attention on verbal cues. On the other hand, non-verbal cues are very many and they mode of use, and the manner of their expression is what catches or influences attention. The vocal produced sounds or paralinguistic for instance will grab attention in case they are used well such as the volume, tone changing, the mood and attitude ( Denny et al., 2011). The speaker master of the sign language or gesture and their use to demonstrate a concept or explain phenomena will influence attention. In case they are not used correctly, this may negatively affect attention.
The self-influences on social heuristics
Decision making in life is inevitable. However, people have ways of deciding case they are faced with one. Heuristics are rules which are often used by the individual when they are confronted with certain decision to make ( Johnson & Lord, 2010). They are more of mental aspect, and they make people give much attention to certain aspect than others in a decision making. One factor which has a significant influence on this misjudgment is self-elements. One factor which is a contributor to this is the availability heuristic. We tend to involve ourselves with what is near or available to us ( Lechuga & Wiebe 2011). They make us make a quick decision without looking deeply into them. For instance, when one is thinking of causes of death in the current world, they will be more likely to go for the most dominant causes of death which are most often published on media. These can be accidents and many others. However, some unavailable or less likely causes of death such as the tornado and terrorism may not be available in self-mind. Another factor is what is called representative heuristic ( Hong & Chang, 2015). In this case, we tend to judge or make a decision based on certain category or a particular group within the society. For instance, when making decision or judgment on the criminal suspect, we tend to categories and compare or check whether the individual look like a criminal, having satisfied their self, they make this short cut decision.
Properties of psychometrically sound measures
Psychometrics property of test related to psychology relates to already collected data on test to know to what extent it can gauge the construct of interest ( Cohen et al., 2010). Statistical analysis to determine the properties of a psychometric is often required to come up with a good psychological test. In a psychological research study, the test must march two categories of psychometrics properties to be regarded well; these are the validity and the reliability. Reliability is properties of the psychometric where the psychometric test can give a consistent result and in a much more stable manner ( Hofmann & Kashdan, 2010). Within the reliability, there are other subcategories such as the Test Rate Reliability. This is the capability of text to have similar results over the period. One should have the same result as tested last month as the one tested this month. Others are parallel reliability which is done using the same devices as to confirm reliability. There is also the internal consistency reliability and others. The second property is the validity. This is the rate or an extent to which the test measures accurately the issue of interest (Wang & Gorenstein, 2013). In this case, the primary focus is whether or not the result is measured as per what was the expectation of the researcher on the study.
References
Cohen, A. S., Matthews, R. A., Najolia, G. M., & Brown, L. A. (2010). Toward a more psychometrically sound brief measure of schizotypal traits: introducing the SPQ-Brief Revised. Journal of personality disorders , 24 (4), 516-537.
Colzato, L. S., de Bruijn, E. R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Up to “me” or up to “us”? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration. Frontiers in Psychology , 3 .
Denny, B. T., Kober, H., Wager, T. D., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of self-and other judgments reveals a spatial gradient for mentalizing in medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 24 (8), 1742-1752.
Förster, J. (2011). Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 140 (3), 364.
Förster, J. (2011). Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 140 (3), 364.
Haworth, C. M., Davis, O. S., & Plomin, R. (2013). Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): a genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioral development from childhood to young adulthood. Twin Research and Human Genetics , 16 (1), 117-125.
Haworth, C. M., Wright, M. J., Luciano, M., Martin, N. G., De Geus, E. J. C., Van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., ... & Kovas, Y. (2010). The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood. Molecular psychiatry , 15 (11), 1112.
Hofmann, S. G., & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). The affective style questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment , 32 (2), 255-263.
Hong, J., & Chang, H. H. (2015). “I” follow my heart and “We” rely on reasons: The impact of self-construal on reliance on feelings versus reasons in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research , 41 (6), 1392-1411.
Johnson, R. E., & Lord, R. G. (2010). Implicit effects of justice on self-identity. Journal of Applied Psychology , 95 (4), 681.
Lechuga, J., & Wiebe, J. S. (2011). Culture and probability judgment accuracy: The influence of holistic reasoning. Journal of cross-cultural psychology , 42 (6), 1054-1065.
Lombardo, M. V., Chakrabarti, B., Bullmore, E. T., Wheelwright, S. J., Sadek, S. A., Suckling, J., ... & MRC Aims Consortium. (2010). Shared neural circuits for mentalizing about the self and others. Journal of cognitive neuroscience , 22 (7), 1623-1635.
Osborne, J. W., & Jones, B. D. (2011). Identification with academics and motivation to achieve in school: How the structure of the self-influences academic outcomes. Educational Psychology Review , 23 (1), 131-158.
Stotz, K. (2010). Human nature and cognitive–developmental niche construction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences , 9 (4), 483-501.
Wang, Y. P., & Gorenstein, C. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria , 35 (4), 416-431.
