Southern California, like most of the other parts in the US, has been facing criminal concerns over a while. Criminal cases have been on the rise ( Dandurand, 2016) . That has put pressure on the government to provide incarceration centers that focus on stopping the cycle of criminal cases by offenders. Even though offenders are incarcerated to serve time, their involvement in jail shouldn’t focus on keeping them there until they serve sentence ( Dandurand, 2016) . The idea of making them law-abiding citizens should be the main focus. While serving their sentence, several programs towards making them better should be provided. In many cases, that goal has been failed ( Dandurand, 2016) . The government has not put enough programs in place to help offenders transform into better people.
The isolation some offenders face from the rest of the world can prove psychologically damaging. When released to the world, it can prove hard for them to connect socially. They indulge in crime again to have a chance to go back to prison and continue living the life they had been used to ( Dandurand, 2016) . The government has failed to some extent on sensitizing offenders on the need to improve their lives ( Dandurand, 2016) . There have been few transformational programs aimed at helping offenders become better when they get out of confinement. That also includes training of a few psychologists and behaviorists to help incarcerated offenders ( Dandurand, 2016) . Specific interventions to help in that have failed dramatically. It has proved re-offending a problem. Successful crime prevention methods must focus on helping the community gets betters. Offenders are part of the community ( Dandurand, 2016) . They must be assisted to break crime cycles from them.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Research Question
How has the government handled the welfare of offenders to have them fully reform and avoid re-offending?
Research Methodology
To get enough information on the research question, two methods will be used:
Use of questionnaires.
Questionnaires will be used on former convicts to identify how they were able to get back into the community and not return to crime. It will also be done on the people involved with the prison system to identify how they have been able to address the question.
Conducting surveys.
Prison systems store data on the people who get incarcerated. If they return to the system again that data is kept too. That data will be sought to identify the numbers of such people and engage them to identify why they were unable to leave criminal life. It will also seek to identify the interventions Southern California has put in place to help convicts become better during and after serving their criminal sentences.
Research Limitations
The inability to find enough ex-convicts to gather information.
Many of them prefer to keep their life in prison private. That means I will not be having enough information to work with. It will leave my research wanting and I will have to extend my research outside Southern California and cover the whole state. Additionally, there is a possibility that the ex-convicts wouldn’t be willing to answer the questions satisfactorily which will affect the efficiency of the reseach.
Lack of government cooperation with regards to the prison department.
There are legal commitments that have to be clarified before convict information is released to a private citizen. As such, I will not be able to get detailed information on the convicts. What I will get will be redundant. Again, I might not get the chance to interview convicts who have been re-incarcerated to find out why they went back to the criminal life.
References
Dandurand, Y. (2016). Alternative Approaches to Preventing Recidivism: Restorative Justice
and the Social Reintegration of Offenders. In Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration (pp. 283-299). Springer, Cham.
