Q1.
Pros
The advantages of privatizing prisons are lesser compared to the damage this has caused. One advantage is the idea that the companies act as debt collectors, thereby easing the work for the courts. Moreover, they ascertain that the courts are in a position to deal with a lot of cases at once. Also, the money collected in terms of fines from offenders have made it possible to have sufficient funds to cater for their activities, such as retirements, police training and crime laboratories (Bronner, 2012).
Cons
Privatizing prisons is capable of causing a lot of harm especially to the low-income individuals. For instance, such companies end up charging the destitute individuals high fines for minor offenses. As a result, such people end up in deep debt or in jail. Also, private institutions do not offer those arrested alternatives to jail and fines (Bronner, 2012). Those caught are also, not aware of their right to legal counsel and hence end up consenting to small offenses which lead them to pay exorbitant fines. The situation also ends up leading to a scenario where a lot of pressure exists in bringing money to the courts at the expense of administering justice.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Q 2.
Social-economic groups are affected differently by for-profit criminal justice. For example, low-income citizens like Randy Miller from Georgia, an army veteran have been involved in a series of law suits. Miller, for instance, lost his job and ended up in jail for failing to pay $860 monthly support payments yet he only gets $273 each month (Bronner, 2012). He has also being charged a $270 fine for drunkenness in a separate incident. The for-profit company further aggravated the situation by sanctioning $15 and $39 for enrollment and monthly fees respectively. Such unnecessary fees and exorbitant charges indicate why this is not fair to disadvantaged groups.
Q 3.
One thing that is certain is that the existence of for-profit prison systems have caused irreparable harm to the citizens, and hence they ought to be limited in the future, or alternatively, have the powers offered to Companies reduced (Harding, 2018) . This is based on the idea that they have led a lot of people into debts and also their quest to make significantly large sums of money for the courts has blinded their mission for justice and fairness. Unless amends are made, such systems should not be allowed to exist in the future.
References
Bronner, E. (2012, July 2). Poor Land in Jail as Companies Add Huge Fees for Probation. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/us/probation-fees-multiply-as-companies-profit.html?_r =1
Harding, R. (2018). Private prisons and public accountability . Routledge.
