I agree with Shaw that Ibsen has been able to ensure that his plays and stage characters are relatable to the audience. Relatable plays are important in ensuring that the audience can be inspired. In Ibsen’s plays, like a doll’s house, the story flow elaborates things that people go through in their daily lives. The choice of alternative ending gives hope to the dying society. Ibsen gives the audience a feeling of themselves in the situation.
How does the time of Christmas reinforce the ideas in the play ?
Christmas is a season when people attribute to material things like the Christmas tree. The materialism of Christmas reinforces the ideas because it can be related to characters like Nora and Torvald, who focused solely on material things like money.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Near the beginning of the play, this last act moves toward a happy ending ,
What is wrong with this alternative ending?
This ending means that Norah was convinced to give her husband another chance. Even more, she stayed because of her children. Ibsen regretted deciding to choose the ending and thus terming it as an alternative ending. The alternative ending is regarded as a disgrace to the original ending.
How does Mrs. Linde’s presence help to define Nora’s character?
Nora’s character is defined at the beginning of the play as a person whose life is put together. Soon after Mrs. Linde came in, she was completely opposite of Nora because she demonstrated a timid character. Her presence was intended to ensure that audiences juxtapose the two women and understand Nora’s character.
How does Nora’s response to Krogstad’s entrance tell us something about Nora?
Nora was up to something that could possibly incriminate her in the bank. Nora and Christine knew the plan and vulnerability of Nora in the forgery process. This tells us that she was afraid.
What does Dr. Rank contribute to the play? If he were eliminated, what would be lost?
Dr. Rank is used to portray a dying society because that is how Ibsen brings out the main characters. The fact that he suffered tuberculosis of the spine is used by Ibsen to show that the societal backbone is deteriorating. If he was eliminated, the pictorial perspective of a dying society could not be conveyed in the play.
What suddenly renders Nora incapable of asking Dr. Rank for a loan?
Nora’s conversation with Mrs. Linde made her change her mind because she wanted to ask for the loan behind her husband’s back. Dr. Rank had also shown some interest in Nora, and she did not want to ask for the loan because it could compromise her marriage.In view of the fact that this last act moves toward a happy ending ,
What is wrong with this alternative ending?
The alternative ending demeans Nora and women in general. She had to stay for the children even if it meant that her life could be compromised.
Can it be argued that—although at the end Nora goes out to achieve self-realization—her abandonment of her children is a crime ?
No. Nora did not abandon her children because even if she stayed, she could not give them the happiness they deserved. She was going through a lot, and she could not stay anymore. It is not a crime that she left. Nora seems to suggest, in some passages, because she forged an autograph that she is frail to bring them up.
How do you see this situation ?
Nora needs to forgive herself and stop blaming herself for what happened. She forged the signature because she was desperately in need. She is fit to bring up her children because she can teach them the right things to do. The play is not so much about women’s privileges as about the need to find out the type of individual he or she is and to strive to become a better creature.
What evidence can you offer to support this interpretation?
Nora’s character can be an explanation for this interpretation because she ignored her rights and gave her husband another chance in the alternative ending. However, she decided to leave without her children to achieve self-fulfillment.
