Question 1
No. The response during the attack was not adequately managed. Firstly, considering that by the time Steven’s was deployed to Libya, Benghazi was already lousy with Militia after the fall of Gadhafi the exposed security measures would be termed as poor. Also with the chaos, weakness of Libya’s military and dominance of militias in the cites and neighborhoods during the Benghazi attacks, the response did not involve significant planning. Further, it was clear that the US agencies had for a longtime misjudged the threat environment.
Secondly, the emergency response did not have definite information on the attack's cause. Initially, they thought the attack resulted from an angered mob, then later found out the attackers were armed Islamists ( Nolan, 2018). The United States government quickly sent their troops for deployment even without accurate information on the attack. The people called to testify were officials from the government, such as Hillary Clinton, whereas the citizens were left out yet would have been obtained from them. The FBI team that was sent to investigate the scene was delayed for almost three weeks due to security issues; hence no essential information was released.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Question 2
I believe the first cause of the subsequent political crisis was that the Republicans feeling that the Obama administration was responsible for the loss of four American lives. The outrage was worsened by Hillary Clinton’s, the then Secretary of State’s response when she was asked within hours of attack why it had occurred. She stated that a film that insulted the religious beliefs of Islamic attackers led to the killings. Alone that signified that state department was trying to make sense of the tragedy, only to learn that the attack was premeditated.
Moreover, the crisis was instigated by the revelation that adequate security lacked in a US diplomatic compound in a volatile country ( Lieberman, & Collins, 2012). This was regarded as a “systemic failure” at the senior-most department level. Republicans also argued that the Obama administration ignored intelligence warnings prior to the attack. When the attack was underway, enough military support was not called for the administration to cover up the truth after the attack. However, while the administration mischaracterized the raid, investigations revealed that the leaders faithfully relied upon the CIA’s assessments and were not deliberately lying as republican purported. The confusion was a significant cause of the political crisis and the division among the House of Representatives on Benghazi. Still, the flow of events due to political gain led to undermining the political process in Libya and the USA and a threat to mislead future policy decisions on Libya hence replacing authoritarian regimes with democracy.
Question 3
Protocols for the protection of U.S diplomatic missions are not adequately adaptive because, after the attack, a drone was sent for surveillance, yet the most a drone can do is take pictures of the place. The sudden attack of the diplomatic facilities twice and at different times proves that the U.S emergency response was not prepared for such occurrences; otherwise, if they were, the answer would have been immediate and the attack less fatal. The attacks show that the perpetrators had their moves calculated, so the attack was a success. Since attacks such as Benghazi were not infrequent before this fateful occurrence, there required to be renewed attention to the challenges confronting foreign dignitaries so that their diplomatic security concerns are well balanced for all their missions overseas ( Priego, 2017).
References
Lieberman, J. I., & Collins, S. M. (2012). Flashing Red: A special report on the terrorist attack at Benghazi . US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Nolan, C. (2018). The U.S. Recreation of the Libyan Terror State: How U.S. Intervention Led to the Attack in Benghazi Benjamin Varlese American Military University INTL650 D001 Summer 2018.
Priego, A. (2017). The Future of the U.S. Diplomatic Representations after the Case of Benghazi: The Brittle Relationship between Security and Diplomacy. The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs , 19 (2), 92-111.
