Criminal justice is the delivery of justice to those who committed crimes. The justice system in a series of government agencies and institutions. Goals of the criminal justice system is rehabilitation of offenders, prevention of other crimes and the moral support of victims. The type of searches authorities can conduct when handling suspects of crime constitute part of the criminal justice delivery system. In the first reply and group discussion I made searches of the real-life examples in the internet. In the Justia website a case in the U.S Supreme court drew my attention. In conducting the research, I made a conclusion that more often than not, suspected criminals are mishandled. Some of the most fundamental rights of suspects are infringed, yet they are taken a step further judged and castigated. The research topic on criminal was enjoyable and herein is a discussion of how the rights of suspects are infringed. The topic sparked my interest based on the rationale of the different types of searches that can be reasonable under the fourth amendment are made by various institutions. The searches for instance were conducted in hospitals. People are searched for security purposes. How people who did not consent to be searched are dealt with is another challenge in justice administration. Administrative searches are made for administrative safety inspections putting more emphasis on inspections. They are more different from police searches. The house owner has a right to ask for proof of warrant before searches are made. Government in most cases does not need authority to enter any premises, be they restricted business premises. Searches by police get argued in court and are sometimes quashed by the complainants. The rules for each type of search are stipulated under the law (Sanders, 2010). Unlawful searches happen, police have to be careful not to violate the stipulations when making searches. Searches allowed to ensure officers safety, to check any weapons carried by suspects for security reasons. Stop and frisk officers do not go into pockets of suspects. Knowing about probable suspicion, of people casually walking and making chats for instance is a challenge. Without warrant for search or arrest, police officers entered the aunt’s respondent’s hotel room. They made arrest claiming they had seized narcotics claimed by the respondent (Sanders, 2010). The respondent was charged to have violated the fourth amendment. The seized narcotics were included in his trial, violating the narcotic laws. A provision is made that illegal items seized shall not be returned to the owner. In the district court, respondent’s goods seized without warrant was denied. The respondent was convicted of violating the narcotics law. Policies on criminal justice searches are related to drug legislation, immigration laws terrorism and national security. Modern day crime policies can be traced and related to crime and advancement in technology. Suspects in most cases have been handled as crime victims. Yet it is difficult to bump on anyone and start to make searches. It makes it challenging to differentiate the criminals and innocent suspects and, in most cases, will likely lead to violation of rights of mere suspects (Tillyer, 2014). The psychological impact of crime victims and interactions between victims and the criminal justice system. The relationship between victims and offenders is separated by a thin line. It was interesting during the search to note that the criminal justice administration focuses mainly on leadership and operations of various aspects of the criminal justice system. They work hand in hand to prevent and punish crime. The main challenge of conducting searches be they police searches or institutional is profiling. Suspects feel that they are criminally profiled yet they could be innocent.
References
Justia. (1951) United States V Jeffer . https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/342/48/
Sanders, A., Young, R., & Burton, M. (2010). Criminal justice . Oxford University Press.
Tillyer, R. (2014). Opening the black box of officer decision-making: An examination of race, criminal history, and discretionary searches. Justice quarterly , 31 (6), 961-985.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
