Napoleon was one of the ambitious leaders who led the French military in conquering abundant part of Europe during the 19 th century (Doyle, 2016) . He used a well-formulated strategy to rise via the ranks of the army during the French Revolt between 1789 and 1799. Napoleon’s genius lay not in transforming the combat itself, but in the refinement of prevailing means. He never proposed any radical modifications in tactics nor invent a new technique of waging warfare, but instead, he outrivaled at the strategic management of the armies of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. However, the effects of infectious diseases that arose on Napoleon’s forces during the Russian campaign around the year 1812, led to the weakening of his power. Thus, it became very difficult for Napoleon to defeat the Russian army because the force had been decimated by diseases.
The main diseases that affected the armed forced included diphtheria, typhus as well as dysentery. In this perspective, due to the suffering and agony that was brought by these diseases, Napoleon’s and his government’s judgment and decision-making process were negatively affected. Most importantly, the infectious diseases had a great impact for military planners, which affected even the future outcomes. For instance, the recent Gulf war that associated with the Gulf war illnesses is one of the implications of what had happened to Napoleon’s forces. The infectious diseases led to the intensive death of the military because the wounds that they incurred during the battle were invitations for infection and Napoleon’s health facilities were not adequately equipped to handle them. Thus, the weakness of Napoleon’s forces was becoming evident during the infections.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Doyle, W. (2016). Napoleon Bonaparte: Emperor . Cavendish Square Publishing, LLC.
