May, J. (2016). Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning. Journal of medical ethics , 42(1), 26-30.
The researcher examines the attitudes of people towards human reproductive cloning. He solely focus on the moral judgments rather than emotional sentiments and reactions. The goal of this is to circumvent the negative emotions and disgust surrounding human cloning to give a moral guide to scientists. The results revealed that most participants deemed human cloning as immoral and should be illegal while some felt it was disgusting and resurgent. This led to the inference that there is some anxiety that still surrounds human cloning, and more should be done to prove its worth.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The article is valid since it a peer-reviewed journal article. The author is an expert in the field of human cloning. His findings are important in determining the ethical guideline for human cloning.
Mohammadi, A. (2019). Human Cloning and Ethical Principles for Research Involving Human Subjects. Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine , 12 (1), 196-209.
The author focuses on the legal and health issues surrounding human cloning. Mohammadi asserts that the fast pace at which biotechnology, which includes cloning, is developing has made it to cross ethical and cultural boundaries. The author believes that cloning presents issues poses a risk to human health and can lead to loss of dignity. Moreover, there are legal and logical issues since scientists lack enough evidence about the biological and mental effects of cloning.
The source is valid since it is a peer-reviewed journal article. Mohammadi is a senior research officer with wide experience if the field of human genetics. His inferences are key in demonstrating the need for more research to determine the effects of human cloning.
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (2017). Biotechnology, ethics, and the politics of cloning. In Biotechnology (pp. 53-88). Routledge.
The authors believe that the issue of cloning has brought human beings at a cross roads due to the ethical and legal issue it presents. To that end, the authors believe that cloning is not a topic that should be solely left to scientists as it affects everybody. They suggest that moral debate should take place within the public sphere since issues involving genetics are moral, political, and scientific.
The source is valid since it is an educational material approved for use in higher education. The authors are researchers in the field of human genetics. Their inferences are vital in enabling the participation of all stakeholders when developing guidelines for cloning.
References
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (2017). Biotechnology, ethics, and the politics of cloning. In Biotechnology (pp. 53-88). Routledge.
May, J. (2016). Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning. Journal of medical ethics , 42(1), 26-30.
Mohammadi, A. (2019). Human Cloning and Ethical Principles for Research Involving Human Subjects. Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine , 12 (1), 196-209.
