Euthanasia remains to be one of the widely discussed topics, especially with regards to autonomy in end of life-related situations. Physician-assisted death is a practice that mainly affects terminally ill patients(Emanuel et al., 2016) It could be a decision made by the individual in question, family members or even as a result of advice by the concerned medical team. Regardless of the medical state and suffering of the patient, taking one’s life is against ethics and general laws of different countries and hence, such acts should be castigated. Deontology theory best suits Euthanasia. Based on this theory, the morality of an action is based on the obligation of the concerned individuals or responsibility for something other than the ultimate effect. In relation to Euthanasia, human life is sacred and hence, it is the responsibility of other human beings to protect it at all cost. Contrary to deontology theory, utilitarianism is based on the outcomes of the actions by an individual. With regards to this theory, Euthanasia can still be viewed to be unethical since it has a considerable number of adverse outcomes. An example is bringing to a halt a life against the will of the patient, possibly ending a life while the patient still had a purpose to live as well as going against different religious doctrines and the constitutions of many countries in the world (Emanuel et al., 2016).
References
Emanuel, E. J., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., Urwin, J. W., & Cohen, J. (2016). Attitudes and practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Jama , 316 (1), 79-90.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
