The family is described as the basic unit of any given social setting, as it serves towards defining the extent to which people are able to view themselves as being part of the society (Kaakinen, Coehlo, Steele, & Robinson, 2018). Before one is able to identify him or herself with the society, he or she is expected to identify with the family unit, which reflects more on the relationships created among different family members. Interfamilial relationships play a critical role towards determining the extent to which persons, within the same family setting, are able to develop elements of trust and confidence towards one another (Barth, 2017). It is important to take note of the fact that the interfamilial relationships are affected by external support systems and stressors, which seek to create a situation where it becomes much more viable to create positive or negative relationships. The aim of this report is to evaluating the external support systems and stressors affecting a family that has been interviewed.
From the genogram, as presented above, it can be noted that indeed the family has maintained a high level of connection with regard to the need for having to enhance the interfamilial relationships. The relationships created among the family members have been developed by a wide array of external support systems. The first support system to note is religion. Religion plays a critical role towards ensuring that individual family members are able to develop the best possible relationship not only among themselves but also with God, who is seen as a supernatural and superior being (Smith & Karam, 2018). Secondly, the family has been able to maintain a positive familial relationship based on the ability for the family members to maintain healthy communication. That allows them to always learn the importance of having to share information amongst themselves while seeking to ensure that they create a standard avenue through which to define the best possible relationship.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Regarding the family stressors, the three main stressors that have been noted are diseases, mental health issues, and divorce. Some of the family members have experienced serious challenges in dealing with chronic health conditions, which has had a major impact on their health outcomes significantly. It can also be noted that some of the family members have suffered from depression with one of the family members committing suicide. The adoption of effective nursing interventions would seek to focus more on ensuring that the family members engage in regular medical checkups (Kerig, 2016). That means that they would be able to identify possible health risks that they face with regard to the possibility of chronic conditions. On the issue of mental health, the individual family members would be able to focus more on close evaluation of each member to determine whether the members are at a likelihood of suffering from mental health issues that affect the nature of the relationships that they develop.
Conclusion
In summary, the family is seen as one of the most important part of any given social setting and institution; thus, meaning that persons are expected to identify themselves with the family before they identify with the society. However, it must be noted that the interfamilial relationship created among individual families are affected by a wide array of external support systems and stressors. In the case of the family that has been interviewed, the main external support systems that can be noted are religion and healthy communication. On the other hand, some of the key stressors noted include diseases, mental health issues, and divorce with each of these factors having serious implications on the family members.
References
Barth, R. P. (2017). Theories guiding home-based intensive family preservation services. In Reaching high-risk families (pp. 89-112). Routledge.
Kaakinen, J. R., Coehlo, D. P., Steele, R., & Robinson, M. (2018). Family health care nursing: Theory, practice, and research (5th ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.\
Kerig, P. K. (2016). Family systems from a developmental psychopathology perspective. Developmental Psychopathology , 1-51.
Smith, M., & Karam, E. (2018). Positive Feedback in Family Systems Theory. Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy , 1-3.
