The article titled "the goldilocks approach to team conflict" is written by Michael Seitchik. The article tries to look into ways leaders may increase innovation as well as revenue in their organizations. Seitchik expresses his idea of an organizational leader and how managers can improve the productivity of their groups. Through the thesis statement, the author suggests that as a result of the need to grow, leaders strive to find ways to inspire innovation among workers to create growth of revenue.
Summary
The article's primary purpose is to analyze the behavior and styles of leaders' leadership and how such traits affect production. For instance, the researcher compared two sets of leaders' behaviors to see how their actions affected the work of those they were leading in terms of productivity and innovativeness. In essence, tolerant leaders were found to be successful in inspiring workers to be innovative instead of intolerant leaders (Seitchik, 2019). This example indicates that leaders may raise innovation levels by allowing conflict through tolerating debates and harsh critiquing in the team. This trait creates an environment that is psychologically safe for sharing ideas.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
One of the crucial topics is innovation, where the research was conducted to determine three dimensions of a manager and how effective they are in ensuring creativity. The dimensions include the ability to create trust, assuring credibility, and implementation. Significantly, leaders who were successful in establishing innovation could unite the team under one cause and create environments that were supportive of risk taking (Seitchik, 2019). These facts indicate that innovation levels increase when the members can easily believe in the cause no matter the risk showing their trust in the process's credibility and approach.
The topic of revenue growth is crucial in showing that communication skills such as listening are essential in growing production. Additionally, a leader must be able to inspire members to experiment hence helping them to trust themselves. The Goldilocks approach suggests that leading requires the creation of psychological tension to ensure more ideas and commitment from members. However, the tension must be moderate (Seitchik, 2019). For example, little tension was found to create lesser engagements by causing a lack of interest, while excessive tension may cause destructive behavior. The article, therefore, emphasizes the need to raise debates and encourage personal views moderately.
Review and Evaluation
The author significantly displays expertise in research and administrative leadership areas. This fact is relatable as the writer analyzes data from the study to form conclusions on the effective leadership styles through comparison (Seitchik, 2019). The article relies on methods such as survey and armchair research, which are appropriate. The survey method helps collect firsthand and accurate information while analyzing information from various sources helps provide an expert opinion. For instance, evidence on confidence score from "so you think you can be an innovator" is accurate as it is based on previous research.
The use and interpretation of the evidence provided leads to a similar conclusion. For instance, the test indicates a difference of 67 items for two groups of leaders who had registered 5% and 1% growth (Seitchik, 2019). This information leads to a similar conclusion as the intended use that leaders who are successful in inspiring growth indicate a difference in style and behavior from those with lower results. No evidence can prove a counterargument since the development of organizations is determined by leadership and level of teamwork, which means that whichever style leaders choose, the productivity is determined by their influence on members.
Conclusion
The information given by the author in the article is agreeable as it is backed by evidence from a survey. Further, despite factors such as motivation through remuneration and employee experience, which affect revenue growth, leadership styles, and team members' behavior are primary factors. Additionally, leaders play a critical role in guiding the decision-making process, which is crucial to determining innovation and growth. The article is, therefore, accurate and evidence-based, which makes it credible. As a result, one can learn that teams' performance depends on approaches of the management, especially in shaping professional behavior such as tolerance and sharing of ideas and motivating the team to be committed. The article is recommendable to coworkers.
Application
Some of the future challenges for teams include communication breakdown and poor work relations due to increased use of machines leading to a lesser need for interactions. These two challenges are likely to cause the inability to function organically hence a reduction in sharing ideas. It is essential to consider that there is expected to be a reduction in creativity without sharing ideas. Essentially, this consideration indicates that teamwork will be needed as there will be the absence of a sense of belonging. One of the crucial teambuilding activities in the future will be traveling away from work premises to camping sites. This activity will help to provide more time for team members to know each other and learn in environments without interference by machines and away from the regular routine.
References
Seitchik, M. (2019). The Goldilocks approach to team conflict: How leaders can maximize innovation and revenue growth. The Psychologist-Manager Journal , 22 (1), 37.
