The process of measuring recidivism can be undertaken in different ways. They include interviewing, analyzing criminal records, and chatting a new offense for a given period. The process can also entail measuring the period that has passed until the next criminal act — measuring the time elapsed until the subsequent offense does have the most significant impact on evaluating the effectiveness of correction policies. According to Makarios, Lovins, Myer & Latessa (2019) c orrection policies are anchored on proper justification to base it on prevailing standards and legitimate correction results that include security, safety, due process, welfare, inmate, and sanitation. However, the process of measuring the time elapse until another crime is committed is bound to affect the due process of having a legitimate correction result. Makarios et al. (2019) argue that the entire measurement process will compromise security, safety, and the due process towards achieving the established correction policy. Following on the time till the next criminal activity is not based on correcting the way of the criminal but on sanitizing his or her criminal engagements, thus rendering any established correction measure worthless. The Revolving Door at the Prison Gate by Padfield provides an unbalanced view of the US correction process and experience. Without due diligence on its part on the whole process of correction and jail term, the article provides a blanket overview that is incorrect and has little justification. According to Padfield and Maruna (2006) , the US prison experience and correction policy are ineffective, unfair, and discriminatory. Over the past years, the Department of Correction has put strategic measures towards aligning the prison and correction centers with acceptable and practical strategies. These have been in the form of seeking an alternative in which prisoners can complete their prison terms that include community service and fines. The article has not covered a comprehensive study on various prison reforms in the US. At the same time, the article is biased as it puts more emphasis on particular races on its analysis and evaluation. Such does not give it a holistic overview of correction measures and sentencing.
References
Makarios, M., Lovins, L. B., Myer, A. J., & Latessa, E. (2019). Treatment Integrity and Recidivism among Sex Offenders: The Relationship between CPC Scores and Program Effectiveness. Corrections , 4 (2), 112-125.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Padfield, N., & Maruna, S. (2006). The revolving door at the prison gate: Exploring the dramatic increase in recalls to prison. Criminology & Criminal Justice , 6 (3), 329-352. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/3140308/the_revolving_door_at_the_prison_gate.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DThe_revolving_door_at_the_prison_gate.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20191127%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20191127T153355Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=c83bbf3bad8941bdad4faa5ab807fdfd0892d82807e641488b837cf95f04726e
