Discuss the impact of the western settlement on the plains nations from 1870-1900?
The Americans fought with the settlers of the plains and eventually they had to live under their power. As a result of their settlement, there were fights because the Americans came to invade them on their land. This brought conflicts, but later they had to live in the reserves. Most plain Indian tribes were nomads, and as a result of the interaction, their lifestyle was eliminated. (Magadza, 2000). The nomadic pastoralists were assimilated into the European culture, and therefore their perception was eroded.
In this manner, the Red Indians culture was soon fading away more than one could ever imagine (Buillard, 2005). To begin with, the weapons they used for defense and hunting they were no match to their invaders’. The European’s weapons were superior to their opponents; the Indians were slowly drowned to start using guns for their new way of hunting and defense. All in all this ways as a major impact of the western settlement invading the plains nations.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Besides, the American settlement also brought about a different influence to increase and take the advantage of the meat business. In this case, the army commanders who were assigned to operate in the west during the construction of the rail often used to kill the buffalos to drive away the Indians. Buffalos were the basic food that Indians used to support their families. The Indians viewed Buffalos not only as a source of food but also used their skins for clothing. In this manner, the American Army commanders took the opportunity of killing the buffalos as a way of chasing the Indians away from the plain land (Eckstein & Nguyen, 2011).
What were the chief points of conflict in the culture wars of the 1920s? What were the underlying issues in these clashes? Why were they so hard to compromise?
Inter-state borders it is one the factors that caused conflict. The boundaries were inherited, and the colonial powers used to fight for them in the African countries. All the borders were the product of treaties performed by the colonial powers so that each can get equal parts.
Military conflicts these occurred among the armies that were fighting for their countries (Stein, 2011). The U.S armies were fighting for their government in the enemies’ land where they ended up being defeated.
Political conflicts occurred in between the parties that wanted to rule in power. It majorly brought fights among the supporters of each party including racism too. In addition to this, the power to rule the land was by fair increasing and so did conflict grow. More so, the different races in the American land needed to have a piece of share to rule the American land.
In addition to this, the difference in the geographical occupation of the land boundaries also brought major conflicts (Magadza, 2000). Majority of the superior colonies wanted to oppress their inferior colonies to extend their boundaries. However, the other colonials were aware of the ailing matter and needed to retain their colonial as intact, an issue that facilitated conflict in the cultural war.
How did the role of the federal government change in the 1930s? What factors were responsible for those changes?
The United States regime did not interfere with the activities of big companies, private associations. When President Roosevelt was elected in the 1930s, he was not satisfied seeing his countrymen suffer in poverty. He introduced another system through the Congress, a system that he felt would be of help to the suffering economy. People debated on it so much but later; it came to change the role of the federal government (Buillard, 2005). The government now has the permission to regulate the economy and engage in the needs of its citizens. While before it was the task of the local government soon, it became decentralized, even the federal government got involved in it.
The new deal made sure that people would live better lives financially. There would be requirement benefits for them and for those who had saved in the banks, it would be easier for them to recover their money.
Seemingly, the federal government had now the mandate to liberate the American to help build the economic growth of the nation. In addition to this, the federal government under the leadership of President Roosevelt, they provided new policies that will help build fair competition to build a steady economy. With this measure in place, the poverty level will soon decrease in American soil.
4
Why did the United States fail to achieve its objectives in Vietnam?
The United States failed because it was fighting against an enemy whose most members came from the country in which the war was being fought. There the enemy had significant support, which made it the winner. The Vietnamese were in their nation thus it was easier to defeat them (Eckstein & Nguyen, 2011).
Secondly, the Americans were not willing to surrender the battle for the owners to win. In this case, the Vietnamese new the weakness of the Americans easily, where they increased the number of their armies to fight the Americans.
Thirdly, fighting in a foreign land was a bit harder for the Americans as the enemies knew the place and measures to overcome the Americans.
How did the Tet offensive affect U.S policy?
The Tet offensive altered by making more Americans oppose the war. The Tet offensive acted as an eye-opener for the Americans to see that it was a lie they were being assured that they would win the war (Dudley, 2011). It showed that their enemies would come up with a defense that would be very strong and coordinated. If their enemies could do this, then they would be defeated, and everything was going to fall apart.
Later on, the test offensive ended up winning by reducing the number of Americans who supported the war. It ensured that the U.S would seek an end to the war. Therefore, it tightened the end of the war by turning American public opinion against it.
As time moved on the Americans were now convinced that they were only fighting a losing battle, as a matter of fact, counter measures steps were to be taken to end the war (Eckstein & Nguyen, 2011). In this manner, the Americans value the lives of the fighting soldiers and their families, a step that facilitated ending of the war.
References
Buillard, P. (2005). The place and role of local government in federal systems . The place and role of local government in federal systems . Retrieved from www.kas.org.za
Dudley, W. G. (2011). What We Learned... from the Tet Offensive. Military History , 27 (5), 17. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=54942918&lang=ja&site=ehost-live
Eckstein, S., & Nguyen, T. N. (2011). The making and transnationalization of an Ethnic niche: Vietnamese manicurists. International Migration Review , 45 (3), 639–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00861.x
Magadza, C. H. D. (2000). Climate change impacts and human settlements in Africa: Prospects for adaptation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment , 61 (1), 193–205. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006355210516
Stein, A. (2011). Culture Wars and Enduring American Dilemmas. Contemporary Sociology , 40 (3), 352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306110404515qq
