The Emergency Quota Act of the year 1921 restricted number of new immigrants entering the country. The basis of the act was economic fear, security, and political fear. On the other hand, the 19th amendment granted women the right to vote after a long struggle by women to gain this right. The two legislations implies that American population has gone through revolution to reach a state where people enjoy nearly equal rights. It implies that there was a struggle to gain the human rights which are currently equally enjoyed by both women, men, native and immigrants in America. The Emergency Quota, for instance, restricted a number of people from specific areas such as Italy and Poland. It further states that racism was a factor which was in existence as early as 1921.
The 19th amendment and the Emergency Quota Act seem to suggest the concerns of the population are based on the equity in human rights, security, and economic stability. The advocate of the 19th amendment claimed that women were equally created by God as Men. It thus necessary to grant them the same rights as those granted to men. On the other hand, Native Americans saw the immigrants as jobs snatchers and security threat to their wellbeing in their country. Their concerns were thus the security of their country as well as the jobs which were becoming limited to the increasing number of immigrants. To them, the true American thus is one who mentally sober, economically stable and with the rights to vote.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The Emergency Quota Act of the year 1921 excluded specific group of people and denied them full right in the country as they were perceived as either security threat or they were already overpopulated in the country. Such were those from Poland and Italy who were perceived to be overpopulated in America. On the other hand, the professional were admitted regardless of their country, while the illiterate and economically unstable people were restricted.
