I agree with the juveniles, parents should bear some responsibility for the crimes committed by minors. The change in economic times has made parents invest so much time working and looking for money to improve their family’s lives. However, this adversely affected the lives of juveniles who are left free to do as they please. In as much, parents provide all the materials their kids need, they fail to instill values needed to navigate and exists in the society (Barnert, et al., 2015). When most juveniles' needs are not met at home, they tend to fill this gap in the streets. Toxicity in families exhibited by many instances of violence and chaos within the family make a child feel misplaced with no one to talk to in the family. Parents must instill discipline and exercise control with their children. Provision of basic needs will not be enough, parents should take it further to create relationships with their children to understand them better and address any unresolved issues as they arise to avoid leading to more damage. . Therefore, they should take the blame as they contribute to juvenile crimes by failing to play their part in parenting. This reading covers exhaustively what has happened for juvenile justice since the 1970s. What was intriguing was the politics which cropped into juvenile justice policies, leading to differing views regarding how to handle juvenile crimes to ensure behavior correction and reentry into the community (Scott & Steinberg, 2009). Missouri’s approach to juvenile proofed to be so effective while saving judiciary more than $11 million, it baffles me why the government could not have extended this program to other states then rather than adopting a graduated system of sanctions and interventions, which mixed both less and serious offenders making the system flawed and ineffective. I learned a lot about how juvenile justice works, the politics involved, and research regarding policy issues influencing juvenile justice policies. The content provided in chapter 8 was so resourceful in deconstructing juvenile justice, with statistical data and detailed explanation on different research programs done before which shades more light to juvenile justice through the provision of different recommendations on how to improve the system. I feel the content was detailed and exhaustive in deconstructing juvenile justice but failed to offer a solid recommendation on the way forward regarding insulating judiciary reforms and policy making process affecting juveniles against the politics that compromises the quality of policies made. California City is located in Antelope Valley in Kern County was incorporated in 1965. It is located 100 miles north of Los Angeles. The following are the highest felonies found in crime mapping as referenced in the map above; larceny, vandalism, and assault. Larceny seemed rampant around 8300 Block Joshua Ave and 12900 Block Choco Road, other than those, larceny is widely spread out. On the contrary, both vandalism and assault seemed to be closely grouped. Crime mapping is essential since it provides reliable data which law enforcement can leverage in making better decisions to allocate resource and formulate strategies that target geographically profiled areas (Santos, 2014). Crime mapping aids law enforcement to discover areas with rampant crimes either in an assault, vandalism, or any other crime. Crime mapping in collaboration with geographical information systems helps law enforcement agencies to identify hot spots of felony. This goes a notch higher through a detailed study of picked hotspots; demographics and state of living to identify causes of crime and address the discovered causes of the problem.
References
Barnert, E. S., Perry, R., Azzi, V. F., Shetgiri, R., Ryan, G., Dudovitz, R., & Zima, B. (2015). Incarcerated Youths’ Perspectives on Protective Factors and Risk Factors for Juvenile Offending: A Qualitative Analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 105 (7), 1365-1371.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Santos, R. B. (2014). The Effectiveness of Crime Analysis for Crime Reduction: Cure or Diagnosis? Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30 (2), 147-168.
Scott, E. S., & Steinberg, L. D. (2009). Rethinking Juvenile Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
