The economy of the Southern states depended squarely on the availability of the slaves, which is not true for the Northern states. Therefore, the Northern states adopted the idea of abolishing slavery quicker than their Southern counterparts. Noteworthy, the Southerners occasionally fought with Northerners to retrieve their escaped slaves since the latter had ways and methods of protecting escaped slaves. However, both regions were of the idea that Africans were not supposed to be given full freedom. Instead, they were accorded partial rights. In most cases, both agreed on laws and regulations that impeded the operability of the Africans so that they could be seen as servants of white masters.
Douglas was of the view that blacks form part of bigger ideals and would all reunite at some point, implying that they will overcome racism in the end. As a result, he chose to fight against white abolitionists in a non-violent way. In his approach, Douglass revolted through the American Anti-Slavery Society, which focused mainly on partial freedom.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
On the other hand, Garnet and Delany chose to recognize that violence will emerge once blacks demanded their freedom. In this sense, they championed for protests and any means of violence. Consequently, their fight was separate from that one of white abolitionists since they wanted complete freedom and nothing else.
In my analysis, Douglas’ approach and integrationist views are more agreeable to as he envisioned that blacks would soon come together as one since they form part of the large community. As a result, his approach was seemingly gradual but efficient in the long run. Garnet and Delany chose an active protest approach, which to me was not a good thing. Instead, it created chaos and brutality toward blacks.
The blacks were used as military servants in both regions. The war broke out because the Northerners had an idea of thwarting an attempt by Southerners to secede and at the same time expand slavery into the western territories. Blacks actively participated in carrying weapons and leading the frontline war.
However, there was a contrast regarding their participation in the regions. In the South, they were used involuntarily and at the same time performed the role of slave labor. Other functions included building fortifications, digging ditches, and helping medical workers. Also, they played the part of camp servants to serve for soldiers and their masters. On the other hand, Northerners championed for wage labor where black militants were paid and at the same time performed voluntary military functions: They were not coerced to join the fighting community. Instead, anyone who felt they should fight could willingly join.
The main difference was that Southerners depended on agriculture as the main source of economic growth. Therefore, they relied on the input of slavery to work on the plantation, and they could not do without slaves. On the contrast, Northerners had abolished slavery, and they did not want Southerners to advance slavery to the emerging western territories.
The period of reconstruction, especially after the civil war was dominated by the urge to give blacks full freedom and prevent any attempts of slavery in the Southern states. The Radical Republicans were motivated by three main things: the desire of some groups to punish southerners for causing civil war, freedmen concern, and political mileage. Lincoln and Johnson advocated for the emancipation of former slaves. In reaction to reconstruction, the Southerners turned violent against blacks, local Republican leaders, and other whites who challenged white authority in the South.
