Introduction
The private, public and the nonprofit sectors can achieve solutions and resolve their problems of this confluence while still achieving their own individual mission and goals. The paper aims at resolving various issues facing Hawaii concerning the non-profit sector, Housing, and Urban Development, real estate development with historic districts. The subject is very critical for the Hawaii government, non-profit organizations, and institutions having an interest in preservation measures.
Section I Architectural Historic Preservation
Why We Preserve History and Tradition in Western Culture
Historic Preservation in Hawaiʻi
Preserving Indigenous Hawaiian Culture
How We Have Carried Out Historic Preservation in the United States
How Historic Preservation Works in Hawaiʻi
State Division of Historic Preservation
Historic Preservation and Residential Property Values
Hedonic Pricing Model Historic Preservation Districts
Rehab of Historic Properties With The Help of Tax Abatements
Nonprofits and Historic Preservation
Preserving Indigenous Hawaiian Culture Through Historic Properties
Why We Preserve History and Tradition in Western Culture
Preservation of the traditional and historical aspect of Western Culture is aimed at building stronger linkages between the conservation and community-based initiatives as a source of pride and environmental sustainability. The act of preservation inspires considerate, professional practices, and upholds a historic based environment. Such plays an essential role in influencing positivity in modern-day life and that of future generations.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Historic Preservation in Hawaiʻi
Laws and regulations guiding historic preservation are derived from the Federal guiding principle. The legal zone comprises of any region that has in place a historical or architectural structure. They are different from small-scale designated areas under the jurisdiction of counties. Property owners are expected to adhere to the guidelines, such as making inappropriate altercations that may have an impact on the buildings. The legislations provide the basis upon which the preservation initiatives will be based.
Preserving Indigenous Hawaiian Culture
Due to the increased number of immigrants from various geographical backgrounds such as Puerto Rico, Korea, Chinese, and Japan, among others, fear has been rife on the risks faced by the traditional heritage of Hawaiian culture. They included historic sites, architecture, events, and language. Preservation was aimed at deriving economic and social benefits, derive pride from the unique established heritage, and get revenue from the economic activities from the Hawaiian culture. As part of the American way of life, Hawaii is proud to represent its unique cultural aspect, a feat that unites it to the general American lifestyle.
How We Have Carried Out Historic Preservation in the United States
Key initiatives and strategies adopted towards the preservation of the cultures include relevant policies that guide maintenance of buildings, documentation, incentives to inspire private owners to conserve the historical sites, and increased research on how to carry out preservation or conservation initiatives. Since private developers own most architectural and historical styles, the Department of Interior Standards have in place guidelines and policies on how the owners can change their buildings without losing the structural aspects. Some of the features that should be maintained include the use of mortar and brick, in addition to glass and stone.
How Historic Preservation Works in Hawaiʻi
The State of Hawaii Historic Preservation Division undertakes all historic conservation and preservation, for example, by having all the architectural properties listed. The government, on the other hand, controls repairs and maintenance. Despite being under the ownership of private individuals, the government has enacted guidelines and policies to be used in upholding the conservation measures of the historical heritage. At the same time, a twenty percent income tax credit is offered to the individuals who support and observe established conservation measures.
State Division of Historic Preservation
The State Division of Historic Preservation is mandated to put in place various preservation guidelines. Identification and evaluation of historic districts and buildings is the first step. The next step is listing the buildings or district on the National Register of Historic Places. After listing or recording, the proprietor is noted to adhere to the guidelines of repair and maintenance, creating the framework to encourage other proprietors. The division is expected to come up with policies and guidelines to help in the conservation measures.
Historic Preservation and Residential Property Values
It is increasing the value of historic architecture in the neighborhoods assists in weaving the ideology of preservation within the communities. The initiative increases value (Approximately by 2 and 4 percent) of the properties as compared to others within the locality. The action helps in upholding the quality and character of the community with an assurance to the buyers that nothing will change to deface the established value. It thus points to socio-cultural and economic cooperation among the locals on preservation measures.
Hedonic Pricing Model Historic Preservation Districts
The hedonic model is also known as the algorithmic model, is used to identify price dynamics based on the hypothesis that outside factors determine pricing in addition to attributes of the products offered for sale. The model is used in the determination of housing markets. It further indicates the relationship existing between environmental externalities and housing prices. By the use of the model, it is easy to apply and understand in comparison to other models involved in price determination.
Rehab of Historic Properties with the Help of Tax Abatements
Tax abatement: is a tax offered to inspire specific actions. Private proprietors are given the 20 percent preservation tax to encourage then to take up historic preservation initiatives. Through the efforts, the offers are aimed at helping the owners maintain the structures for the future. With historic preservationists and investors existing side by side, the two entities can work towards architectural preservation while at the same time enjoying tax incentives and government concessions.
Nonprofits and Historic Preservation
The National Trust for Historic Preservation is a non-profit entity. Its mission statement is to protect noteworthy sites and places by encouraging broad public involvement and support. Ever since its inception in 1949, the organization has endeavored to uphold and support the preservation and maintenance initiatives. It has, over the years, build sustainable communities by the reuse of historic sites, empowering and preserving cultural differences.
Preserving Indigenous Hawaiian Culture through Historic Properties
The National Trust for Historic Preservation provides financial assistance to preservation measures. They work hand in hand with governmental agencies towards stringent devotion to established preservation measures. Through financial support, the non-profit organization helps the nation meet its preservation measures. Their effort and initiatives have much improved in the saving and promotion of indigenous Hawaiian cultural heritage.
Section II Preservation and Development
Real Estate Development
Real Estate Development in Hawaiʻi
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Preservation vs. Development
Preservation and Development in Hawaiʻi
Real Estate Development
Development within the cultural heritage entails the act of enhancing property quality by increasing its longevity and productivity. The feat is achieved by the use of durable materials, advanced technologies, and cheaper materials. Both development and preservation are essential as it helps in maintaining the quality of cultural artifacts and buildings with the primary aim of improving buildings quality.
Real Estate Development in Hawaiʻi
The primary goal of development and preservation is to maintain the quality of architectural buildings, make them productive, durable, and appealing. The initiative is achieved by urban renewal whereby the government enacts legislation that is aimed at improving the quality of buildings in Hawaii and in particular, identified places of interest.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
The Department is mandated by offering Americans with non-discriminative, affordable, and accessible housing. It creates and develops policies and initiatives that relate to metropolis and housing. Its mission is to create strong, viable, and wide-ranging quality and affordable housing. It also works towards shielding consumers and strengthening the economy towards the achievement of affordable and quality rental housing through various initiatives and programs.
Preservation vs. Development
Various techniques and strategies are used to maintain architectural styles and designs. They include methods such as the use of quality materials and designs. The primary aim of development is to enhance their longevity through the application of quality products. Preservation helps in the maintenance of historical heritage by improving on their quality and encouraging ideas of productivity and durability.
Preservation and Development in Hawaiʻi
Hawaii applies both concepts of preservation and maintenance (quality materials and designs). Both real estate developers and proprietors strive towards improving the quality and outlook of architectural houses to their original appearances. The urban renewal is one such initiative aimed at enhancing the quality of dwellings and encourages their productivity too. The Waikiki War Memorial pool is one such example. The action applies the use of a beach to make it historic and more practical. In the urban renewal, which entails identification of areas where to undertake redevelopment? Second is the elimination of building and structures put up on land. The third step is the maintenance and development of the identified regions. Lastly is the smooth transition of new and old improved structures.
Section III Case Studies
Case Study Philadelphia
Case Study New York
Feasible Historic District in Hawaiʻi
Case Study Philadelphia
Philadelphia’s historic site stretches from Delaware River to Lombard Street. It is at the center of the city and known as the United States World Heritage City. It is famous for art galleries, renowned restaurants, and private boutiques. Some of the best-known features include Franklin Square, the Delaware River Waterfront, and Washington Square. The city has in place well-founded strategies and initiatives for maintaining its historic sites and buildings, such as commemorating past languages, art, and people. Hawaii can replicate and apply some of these concepts to improve and preserve its heritage.
Case Study New York
Audubon Park serves as a historic district in New York and is made up of the duplex house. It boasts of twelve prominent houses in the southern established in the 19th century. The home serves as a critical historic site in the city. Hawaii can borrow much from New York by identifying unique buildings and features for preservation. It can also enact and apply landmark preservation by accommodating new activities and needs, economic growth, and neighborhood revitalization.
Feasible Historic District in Hawaiʻi
Hawaii culture traces its roots to over 100 years. Despite multiple changes to the features and threats of extinction, it is still essential to preserve and promote the unique heritage. Language remains the most affected, and nonprofit organizations can identify particular ways of keeping historic features. Some of the initiatives include real estate agencies and real estate development.
Section IV Maintaining Historic Districts the Public Process
Penn Central Transportation Co, v. New York City
Agnis v. Tiburon
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Angeles County
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
Penn Central Transportation Co, v. New York City
The Supreme Court Historic Preservation landmark case is a barrier to the preservation of the Hawaiian Historic District. The case has had an impact on preservation measures and initiatives hindering preservation attempts. At the same time, the Pen Central case has had a substantial effect on preservation measures and actions. Many developers and agencies have, however, not complied with the outlined proposals on the development of architectural properties. The Hawaiian has, however, drawn positive benefits from established laws that aim at improving historical districts.
Agnis v. Tiburon
The Agins v. Tiburon has also remained a remarkable case in the Supreme Court. The case arose out of the placement of the Agins property under the Residential Development and Open Space Zone. The restrictions that resulted from the case discouraged developers from enacting real estate development leading to high costs of maintenance. The situation has further led to high procedural costs in the maintenance and construction property dealing a blow to preservation initiatives and measures.
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Angeles County
The First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County is another serious case decided on by the Supreme Court ( Gould Jr, 1987) . The case necessitated policies that cities had to undertake as a regulatory measure. The regulations remained the same as in the Penn Central case. It had a significant effect on the normal working of Hawaii, majorly due to urban renewal making most projects unfavorable to locals.
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Angeles County
The First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County is another serious case decided on by the Supreme Court ( Gould Jr, 1987) . The case necessitated policies that cities had to undertake as a regulatory measure. The regulations remained the same as in the Penn Central case. It had a significant effect on the normal working of Hawaii, majorly due to urban renewal making most projects unfavorable to locals.
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission helped solve multiple challenges faced by the Hawaiian Historic District in which the city can use the historic preservation area by using the Supreme Court’s directives ( Gerry, 1999) . The state can thus incorporate the proprietors of the properties in agreements to allow the owners and the government to agree on mutual grounds.
Section V Analysis and Solution
Analysis
Solution
Analysis
From the above scenarios, it is evident that the government and Hawaii real estate sector faces an uphill task. The most outstanding feature is that much of the real estate ownership is private, arousing conflict of interest among the entities engaged. However, maintenance of the Historic heritage is critical, and strategic measures need to be enacted. All stakeholders should thus adopt strategic measures and initiatives to achieve sustainable historic preservations.
Solution
It is crucial to create a balance between real estate developers and preservationists to account for the preservation of historic resources. Above all, preservation initiatives and programs should focus on inclusion to achieve comprehensive and accurate preservation measures. Despite the big divide and diversity regarding ethnicity, race, socio-economic aspects, and age, preservation measures should be inclusive of all communities across the state.
Section VI Conclusion
Due to the arising dynamics, preservationists need to undertake drastic measures and counter the widespread devastation of Hawaii’s historic landmarks. Corporate development should be stopped as they serve no purpose in the preservation measures. In many cases, they do not serve the purpose or needs of the locals and at the same time, cannot change to the arising social and economic situations.
Reference
Gould Jr, A. R. (1987). First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles: Compensation for Temporary Takings. La. L. Rev. , 48 , 947.
Gerry, B. C. (1999). Parity Revisited: An Empirical Comparison of State and Lower Federal Court Interpretations of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y , 23 , 233.
