It is apparent that immunization is one of mankind`s greatest achievements. It enhances the quality of life and offers protection from acquisition of serious infections. Currently, it is expected that internal structures pertaining to HSOs/HSs will correspond to complexity pertaining to their associated environments with an intention of attaining a desirable fit within the environment (Gellin, 2016). The systems theory relating to the National Adult Immunization Plan (NAIP) and which are to be reflected on involve: Agency, corporate liability, corporate negligence, independent negligence and enterprise liability.
Based on the theory of agency, principals are responsible for the actions of their agents. Vicarious liability is, therefore, administered to the master who is the individual best suited to take up liability (Longest & Darr, 2014). This implies that the master is responsible for whatever happens to those they are in charge of. One can also discern that the Federal government is accountable for ensuring that aspects such as quality initiatives that ascertain vaccination rates are enforced (Official, 2015). Corporate liability in this case alludes to the general theory that the HSO has a duty to patients (Longest & Darr, 2014). They can, hence, be held liable in the event that anything negative occurs. Alternatively, one can also view this by alluding to the idea that owing to the high accessibility pharmacists have to healthcare professionals, they are responsible for adult immunization (Edwards et al., 2015).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Independent and corporate negligence theories merge to become one (Longest & Darr, 2014). Health professionals end up being conferred a great degree of independence. In this case if they cause injury, they end up being held liable independent of the health facility they work for (Gellin, 2016). The institution is, thus, not liable for any injury. Enterprise liability, on the other hand, pertains to the aspect of channeling responsibility to the HSO (Mariner, 1992). This, nonetheless, has to satisfy: insurance improving their insurance pricing ability, for instance, by eliminating high risk specialties, elimination of problems imminent in the malpractice market, physicians not being held liable in malpractice suits, reduction in administrative costs, and deterring poor medical practices (Longest & Darr, 2014). The systems theories, therefore, present viable arguments on the subject of NAIP.
References
Edwards, N., Corsten, E. G., Kiberd, M., Bowles, S., Isenor, J., Slayter, K., & McNeil, S. (2015). Pharmacists as immunizers: a survey of community pharmacists’ willingness to administer adult immunizations. International journal of clinical pharmacy , 37 (2), 292-295.
Gellin, B. G., Shen, A. K., Fish, R., Zettle, M. A., Uscher-Pines, L., & Ringel, J. S. (2016). The national adult immunization plan: strengthening adult immunization through coordinated action. American journal of preventive medicine , 51 (6), 1079-1083. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=National+Adult+immunization+plan&btnG=
Longest Jr, B. B., & Darr, K. J. (2014). Managing Health Services Organizations and Systems, (MHSOS) . Health Professions Press, Inc.
Mariner, W. K. (1992). I. Legislative Report: The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Health Affairs , 11 (1), 255-265. https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.11.1.255
Official, D. F. (2015). Assessing the state of vaccine confidence in the United States: recommendations from the National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Public Health Reports , 130 , 573. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2015&q=U.S.+DEPARTMENT+OF+HEALTH+AND+HUMAN+SERVICES+THE+NATIONAL+VACCINE+PROGRAM+OFFICE&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5#d=gs_cit&u=%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dinfo%3ATQzZpzEUTjIJ%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26scirp%3D3%26hl%3Den
