Emergency medical services (EMS) or ambulance services are healthcare services that attend to urgent medical services to save the lives of injured patients who need treatment before they arrive at the designated medical facility. The service provides out of hospital treatment and safe transport to the nearest medical center. EMS workers are hired and certified as the first responders or emergency medical technicians and paramedics who administer first aid and the necessary care before handing over to the emergency department team in a medical facility (Shah, Gross & Brown, 2019). EMS employees are protected and guided by several federal legislations that influence their career life in the promotion of efficiency under EMS work organization and time management.
Occupational safety and health act is a legislation passed in 1970 that requires employers to maintain safety in the workplace while adhering to specific standards of care to reduce workplace hazards and implement safety programs for both employees and employers. According to Kim and Park (2016), the act protects worker’s health by preventing any possible occupational injuries and diseases that may be a hazard to the wellness of the employees. Additionally, the act fosters the general public welfare and safeguards them from health and safety risks associated with business activities and eliminates any environmental hazards that may affect the surrounding community.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
I believe that the act is important in fostering the health and safety of employees and employers by setting standards, information, and training that guarantees workforce health and safety. According to the ruling made by the senate in 1970, a general duty clause was included to ensure that every employer shall furnish his or her employees with a working environment that is free from hazards that could cause death or physical harm to the employees. It also helps to reduce environmental incidents that may portray a negative image to the surrounding community and stakeholders. To the work organization efficiency, the act promotes the wellness of every staff member and assures them a risk-free working environment. Under EMS time management, the act advocates rapid response to any emergency that pertain to the safety of employees or employers against the accidental occurrence.
Civil rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination and racial segregation against black Americans living and working in the United States. The law banned discrimination on the basis of color, race, religion, gender or national origin of people in public places to promote equality and justice to all citizens (Andrews & Gaby, 2015). The law was meant to protect the people of color from further harassment by police and calm down protests that had sprung up throughout the South. In the employment sector, the law prohibited employers and labor unions from discriminating against employees based on their race, religion, and gender by creating a commission that allows equal employment opportunity. The commission had the power to sue employers on behalf of aggrieved parties.
I think the law was important in guarding workers against possible harassment or any kind of discrimination that was meant to demean people from certain racial backgrounds. According to the actual ruling of July 1964, the Civil rights Act granted freedom to the minority groups and ended racial segregation in public places such as schools, hotels, and workplaces by granting equal rights to all men and women living and working in the United States. African Americans got equal employment opportunities. It helped file a lawsuit against employers who violated the law. The act granted justice to the aggrieved parties. To the work organization efficiency, the law reduced hostility between workers and employers and created a conducive working environment for both parties thus improving the productivity of all organizations. Under EMS time management, the law has eliminated time wasted during unnecessary protests that would deter service delivery to the people who needed urgent healthcare.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010 to ensure that everyone is covered under an insurance healthcare program thus avoid or lower emergency room visits that would cut down healthcare costs. Finegold and Musco (2015) asserted that the law advocated for the inclusion of citizens who were not insured. It encouraged them to purchase the policy and possibly be given a subsidy. Failure to comply would make one get a tax penalty. The policy regulates insurance companies, healthcare providers, employers and individuals under common guidelines in offering healthcare coverage.
I think the law is important in minimizing the overall budget cost that the government pays to insurance companies and hospitals. According to the provisions of the actual ruling which took effect in 2014, the insurers were prohibited from denying coverage to individuals without pre-conditions. States had to cover insurance for children without coverage from their families, and no dropping of policyholders by insurance companies when they get sick. The Act required at least 80 percent of premiums dollars to be spent on health costs in a bid to provide essential health benefits and ensure maximum coverage. It could also help to raise Medicare funds through taxes and penalties which fund it. It promotes efficiency in healthcare by enabling individuals to get affordable healthcare service at any time they get sick. Under EMS time management, time is saved since there is no need to solicit for funds. Urgent care is also administered to patients as provided by the act.
References
Shah, M. I., Gross, T., & Brown, K (2019). Pediatric Readiness in Emergency Medical Services Systems. Pediatrics .
Kim, Y, & Park, M. (2016). Creating a culture of prevention in occupational safety and health practice. Safety and health at work , 7 (2), 89-96.
Andrews, K. T., & Gaby, S. (2015, June). Local protest and federal policy: The impact of the civil rights movement on the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 30, pp. 509-527).
Finegold, K., & Musco, T. (2015). Changes in self-reported insurance coverage, access to care, and health under the Affordable Care Act. Jama , 314 (4), 366-374.
